...
首页> 外文期刊>CNS spectrums >Obsessive compulsive and related disorders: comparing DSM-5 and ICD-11
【24h】

Obsessive compulsive and related disorders: comparing DSM-5 and ICD-11

机译:强迫症和相关疾病:比较DSM-5和ICD-11

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been recognized as mainly characterized by compulsivity rather than anxiety and, therefore, was removed from the anxiety disorders chapter and given its own in both the American Psychiatric Association (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and the Beta Draft Version of the 11th revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This revised clustering is based on increasing evidence of common affected neurocircuits between disorders, differently from previous classification systems based on interrater agreement. In this article, we focus on the classification of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs), examining the differences in approach adopted by these 2 nosological systems, with particular attention to the proposed changes in the forthcoming ICD-11. At this stage, notable differences in the ICD classification are emerging from the previous revision, apparently converging toward a reformulation of OCRDs that is closer to the DSM-5.
机译:强迫症(OCD)的主要特征是强迫症而不是焦虑症,因此已从焦虑症章节中删除,并在《美国精神病学协会(APA)精神疾病诊断和统计手册》中都有介绍( DSM-5)和世界卫生组织(WHO)国际疾病分类(ICD-11)第11版的Beta版草案。此修订的聚类基于疾病之间常见的受影响神经回路的证据不断增加,这与以前基于人际协议的分类系统不同。在本文中,我们将重点放在强迫症和相关疾病(OCRD)的分类上,研究这两种疾病学系统采用的方法的差异,尤其要注意即将到来的ICD-11的拟议变更。在此阶段,ICD分类与以前的修订版之间出现了显着差异,显然趋向于重新制定更接近DSM-5的OCRD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号