首页> 外文期刊>Community dental health >The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in dental public health
【24h】

The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in dental public health

机译:牙科公共卫生随机对照试验报告的质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To assess the quality of the reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in dental public health journals. Method; Electronic and hand searches were used to search for RCTs published in the following three journals over the period 1993 - 2008: Community Dental Health, Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology and the Journal of Public Health Dentistry. Exclusion criteria were applied. Each of the resulting papers was reviewed and scored, according to 56 criteria, based on the CONSORT statement. Results: The search identified 48 papers. The average number of criteria present per article was 27.0 (SD = 6.9), with variation between journals as follows: Community Dental Health (27.7); Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology {21 4); Journal of Public Health Dentistry (23.2). The average number of criteria present per article increased over the time period used. Conclusion: There were inadequacies in the reporting of trials in dental public health journals. The quality of the reporting could be improved if the CONSORT statement was followed more closely.
机译:目的:评估牙科公共卫生期刊中随机对照试验(RCT)报告的质量。方法;使用电子和手工搜索来搜索在1993年至2008年期间在以下三种期刊中发表的RCT:社区牙科健康,社区牙科与口腔流行病学和公共卫生牙科杂志。应用排除标准。根据CONSORT声明,根据56项标准对每篇论文进行审查和评分。结果:搜索确定48篇论文。每篇文章的平均标准数量为27.0(标准差= 6.9),不同期刊之间的差异如下:社区牙齿健康(27.7);社区牙科与口腔流行病学(21 4);公共卫生牙科杂志(23.2)。每篇文章的平均标准数量在使用的时间段内有所增加。结论:牙科公共卫生期刊的试验报告存在不足之处。如果更严格地遵循CONSORT声明,可以提高报告的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号