...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental allergy : >A UK national survey of investigations for beta-lactam hypersensitivity - heterogeneity in practice and a need for national guidelines - on behalf of British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI)
【24h】

A UK national survey of investigations for beta-lactam hypersensitivity - heterogeneity in practice and a need for national guidelines - on behalf of British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI)

机译:代表英国过敏和临床免疫学会(BSACI)对β-内酰胺超敏反应进行调查的英​​国国家调查-实践中的异质性和对国家指南的需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Beta lactams (BL) are the most widely prescribed antibiotics in the UK and the commonest cause of hypersensitivity reactions. There are no UK guidelines for BL testing and the most relevant guidelines were devised by the European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) on behalf of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Objective: Delivery of allergy services differs across Europe, so this survey was designed to investigate how closely UK practice adhered to these guidelines. Methods: An online survey, using surveymonkey.com software, was sent to all consultants offering an allergy service in the UK and who were members of either BSACI or 'Travellers' (Immunology consultant group). Results: The response rate was 48% (n=81/165) and BL allergy testing was undertaken by 78% of respondents. All responders requested SsIgE, although four responders stated they rarely requested. Skin testing was undertaken by 87% of respondents who perform beta lactam testing with 17% undertaking skin prick testing (SPT) only, 77% SPT followed by intra-dermal testing (IDT) if the former were negative or indeterminate and 6% SPT and IDT in all cases. The drugs, doses and protocols for skin testing varied considerably. Drug provocation testing was undertaken by 87% of respondents who undertake beta lactam testing with significant heterogeneity in protocols. Respondents that investigated ≤ 20 patients per year demonstrated lower adherence to ENDA recommendations compared to those who saw > 20. Following positive testing, 79% advised avoidance of all penicillins only and the remainder advised additional drug avoidance. Conclusion and clinical relevance: This survey revealed variation in the investigation and management of BL hypersensitivity in the UK with some centres reporting procedures that could potentially put patients at risk of anaphylaxis if allergy was falsely excluded. This survey highlights an urgent need for evidence based national guidelines and standardisation of practice.
机译:背景:β内酰胺(BL)是英国处方最广泛的抗生素,也是超敏反应的最常见原因。英国尚无有关BL检测的指南,最相关的指南是由欧洲药物过敏网络(ENDA)代表欧洲过敏和临床免疫学会设计的。目标:欧洲各地的过敏服务交付情况有所不同,因此,本次调查旨在调查英国实践对这些准则的遵守程度。方法:使用Surveymonkey.com软件将在线调查发送给英国所有提供过敏服务的顾问,这些顾问是BSACI或“旅行者”(免疫学顾问组)的成员。结果:回应率为48%(n = 81/165),有78%的受访者进行了BL过敏测试。所有响应者都要求SsIgE,尽管有四个响应者表示他们很少要求。进行β-内酰胺测试的受访者中有87%进行了皮肤测试,只有17%的人进行了皮肤点刺测试(SPT),77%的SPT然后是皮内测试(IDT)(如果前者是阴性或不确定的话),而6%的SPT和在所有情况下都是IDT。用于皮肤测试的药物,剂量和方案差异很大。 87%的受访者在进行协议中具有明显异质性的β-内酰胺测试时进行了药物激发试验。每年调查≤20位患者的受访者对ENDA推荐的依从性低于那些看到> 20岁的患者。在阳性测试后,79%的人建议仅避免使用所有青霉素,其余人建议进一步避免使用青霉素。结论与临床意义:这项调查显示了英国BL超敏性的调查和管理存在差异,一些中心报告说,如果错误地排除了过敏症,可能会使患者面临过敏反应的风险。这项调查突显了迫切需要基于证据的国家准则和行为规范。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号