...
【24h】

Comparison of checking behavior in adults with or without checking symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder using a novel computer-based measure

机译:使用一种新型的基于计算机的测量方法,对有或没有强迫症症状的成年人进行检查行为的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Easy to administer behavioral measures of checking are needed to improve the assessment of this hallmark feature of OCD. We recently developed a new computer-based behavioral assessment of OCD in a previous study. As a follow-up experiment for this method, the goal of this study was to examine whether the new computer-based behavioral assessment would be capable of differentiating behaviors in adults with OCD characterized by checking behavior from those without checking behavior. We compared 22 OCD patients with compulsive checking behaviors (OCD checkers), 17 OCD controls without checking behavior (OCD controls), and 31 healthy controls (HCs) on a novel computer-based behavioral measure of checking behavior. Despite similar levels of successfully completed tasks, OCD checkers demonstrated longer duration of checking behaviors than OCD controls or HCs. Interestingly, no differences were found between OCD controls and HCs in any of the dependent variables. Our new behavioral measure offers a novel, objective, and ecologically valid measure of checking behaviors in a sample of adults with OCD.
机译:需要易于管理的检查行为措施来改进对强迫症的这一特征的评估。我们最近在先前的研究中开发了一种新的基于计算机的强迫症行为评估。作为此方法的后续实验,本研究的目的是检验新的基于计算机的行为评估是否能够区分以行为检查为特征的成人强迫症与未检查行为为特征的成年人行为。我们基于一种新颖的基于计算机检查行为的行为量度方法,对22名强迫检查行为的强迫症患者(OCD检查者),17名无检查强迫症的强迫症患者(OCD对照)和31名健康对照者(HC)进行了比较。尽管成功完成任务的水平相近,但与强迫症控制或对照相比,强迫症检查员表现出更长的检查行为持续时间。有趣的是,在任何因变量中,OCD控件和HC之间均未发现差异。我们的新行为量度提供了一种新颖,客观且生态学有效的量度,用于检查成年强迫症成年人的行为。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号