...
首页> 外文期刊>Computational statistics >On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2010
【24h】

On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2010

机译:关于Microsoft Excel 2010中统计程序的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

All previous versions of Microsoft Excel until Excel 2007 have been criticized by statisticians for several reasons, including the accuracy of statistical functions, the properties of the random number generator, the quality of statistical add-ins, the weakness of the Solver for nonlinear regression, and the data graphical representation. Until recently Microsoft did not make an attempt to fix all the errors in Excel and was still marketing a product that contained known errors. We provide an update of these studies given the recent release of Excel 2010 and we have added OpenOffice.org Calc 3.3 and Gnumeric 1.10.16 to the analysis, for the purpose of comparison. The conclusion is that the stream of papers, mainly in Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, has started to pay off: Microsoft has partially improved the statistical aspects of Excel, essentially the statistical functions and the random number generator.
机译:统计人员批评Microsoft Excel直到Excel 2007之前的所有早期版本,其原因有很多,其中包括统计函数的准确性,随机数生成器的属性,统计插件的质量,求解器在非线性回归方面的弱点,以及数据图形表示。直到最近,Microsoft仍未尝试修复Excel中的所有错误,并且仍在销售包含已知错误的产品。鉴于最近发布的Excel 2010,我们提供了这些研究的更新,并且为了比较起见,我们在分析中添加了OpenOffice.org Calc 3.3和Gnumeric 1.10.16。结论是,主要在计算统计和数据分析方面的论文流已开始获得回报:Microsoft已部分改善了Excel的统计方面,从本质上改善了统计功能和随机数生成器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号