首页> 外文期刊>Bioresource Technology: Biomass, Bioenergy, Biowastes, Conversion Technologies, Biotransformations, Production Technologies >Comparative study of four extraction methods for enterovirus recovery from wastewater and sewage sludge
【24h】

Comparative study of four extraction methods for enterovirus recovery from wastewater and sewage sludge

机译:从废水和污泥中回收肠道病毒的四种提取方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigated four methods for the recovery of enteroviruses from sterilized raw wastewater, activated sludge, thickened sludge and treated wastewater, inoculated with Echovirus 11, Gregory prototype. The adsorption-elution method recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was better for Echovirus 11 recovery than a sonication method, a modified EPA method and a membrane adsorption elution method since it resulted in the highest detection levels by cell culture and RT-PCR (Friedman's test, p < 0.00041 and p = 0.041, respectively). (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究调查了用Echovirus 11 Gregory原型接种的从无菌原废水,活性污泥,增稠污泥和处理过的废水中回收肠病毒的四种方法。由美国环境保护署(EPA)推荐的吸附洗脱方法比超声处理,改良的EPA方法和膜吸附洗脱方法更适合于Echovirus 11的回收,因为它可以通过细胞培养和RT-PCR产生最高的检测水平。 PCR(Friedman检验,分别为p <0.00041和p = 0.041)。 (c)2005 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号