首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental ophthalmology >New paediatric contrast test: Hiding Heidi low-contrast 'face' test.
【24h】

New paediatric contrast test: Hiding Heidi low-contrast 'face' test.

机译:新的儿科对比测试:隐藏Heidi低对比度“面部”测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The Hiding Heidi low-contrast 'face' test is a new paediatric contrast test to evaluate the ability to detect objects with low contrast. The purpose of the present study was to compare the Hiding Heidi low-contrast 'face' test (HH) with the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test (PR) and the functional acuity contrast test (FACT) in the low-contrast assessment. Methods: Thirty university students participated in the present study. The contrast ability was evaluated by using three different methods: HH, PR and FACT. The HH was repeated on two separate occasions to test the repeatability. Results: There was a significant positive correlation between HH and PR (r = 0.65, P < 0.01); between HH and FACT at 6 cycles per degree (c.p.d.; r = 0.64, P < 0.01); between HH and FACT at 3 c.p.d. (r = 0.91, P < 0.01); and between HH and FACT at 1.5 c.p.d. (r = 0.56, P < 0.01). The paired t-test showed a significant difference between HH and PR (t = -6.05, P < 0.01); between HH and FACT at 6 c.p.d. (t = -11.16, P < 0.01); between HH and FACT at 3 c.p.d. (t = -8.35, P < 0.01); and between HH and FACT at 1.5 c.p.d. (t = -5.64, P < 0.01). They had good agreement. The HH had a high repeatability. Conclusions: The HH had a positive correlation but produced significantly different readings when compared with FACT and PR. The features and role of HH in clinical contrast sensitivity assessment are discussed.
机译:背景:隐藏式海蒂低对比度“面部”测试是一种新型的儿科对比测试,旨在评估检测低对比度对象的能力。本研究的目的是在低对比度评估中比较Hiding Heidi低对比度“面部”测试(HH)与Pelli-Robson对比敏感性测试(PR)和功能敏锐度对比测试(FACT)。方法:30名大学生参加了本研究。使用三种不同的方法评估对比能力:HH,PR和FACT。在两个不同的场合重复HH,以测试可重复性。结果:HH与PR之间存在显着正相关(r = 0.65,P <0.01);在每度6个周期的HH和FACT之间(c.p.d .; r = 0.64,P <0.01);下午3点在HH和FACT之间(r = 0.91,P <0.01);并且在HH和FACT之间在1.5 c.p.d. (r = 0.56,P <0.01)。配对t检验显示HH和PR之间有显着差异(t = -6.05,P <0.01);下午6点在HH和FACT之间(t = -11.16,P <0.01);下午3点在HH和FACT之间(t = -8.35,P <0.01);并且在HH和FACT之间在1.5 c.p.d. (t = -5.64,P <0.01)。他们有很好的协议。 HH具有很高的重复性。结论:HH与FACT和PR呈正相关,但读数却显着不同。讨论了HH在临床对比敏感性评估中的特征和作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号