...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental ophthalmology >Spherical aberration, visual performance and pseudoaccommodation of eyes implanted with different aspheric intraocular lens.
【24h】

Spherical aberration, visual performance and pseudoaccommodation of eyes implanted with different aspheric intraocular lens.

机译:植入不同非球面人工晶状体的眼睛的球差,视觉性能和假适应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare spherical aberration, visual performance and pseudoaccommodation in pseudophakic eyes implanted with aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs) of Tecnis Z9001 with negative spherical aberration (AMO Inc.), aspheric aberration-free IOLs of Akreos AO (Bausch & Lomb Inc.) and spherical IOLs of KS-1 (Cannon Staar Inc.). METHODS: A total of 196 patients presenting for cataract surgery were randomly assigned to receive one of three types of IOLs in one eye. Spherical aberration, best-corrected far visual acuity (BCFVA), distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), contrast sensitivity, glare sensitivity and pseudoaccommodation were measured and compared 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 3 months postoperatively, the mean spherical aberration Z(4,0) for 5 mm pupil size in eyes with Tecnis Z9001 IOLs, Akreos AO IOLs, and KS-1 IOLs were 0.022 +/- 0.071 microm, 0.141 +/- 0.070 microm and 0.210 +/- 0.108 microm, respectively (P < 0.001), and significant difference was also found in two asphericIOLs (P < 0.001). Compared with spherical KS-1 IOLs, Tecnis Z9001 IOLs significantly improved the contrast sensitivity at 4.0 degrees, 2.5 degrees visual angle and glare sensitivity at 4.0 degrees, 2.5 degrees, 2.0 degrees, 1.6 degrees visual angle, Akreos AO IOLs significantly improved contrast sensitivity at 2.5 degrees and glare sensitivity at 4.0 degrees, 2.5 degrees, 2.0 degrees, but no difference statistically significance were found between two aspheric IOLs at any visual angle. In addition, there was no significant difference among three IOLs regarding BCFVA, DCNVA and pseudoaccommodation. CONCLUSIONS: All the studied IOLs can provide good visual acuity. Compared with spherical IOLs, both aspheric IOLs can significantly decrease spherical aberration and improve visual performance without the reduction of pseudoaccommodation amplitude.
机译:目的:比较植入有Tecnis Z9001非球面人工晶状体(IOL)和负球面像差(AMO Inc。),Akreos AO(Bausch&Lomb Inc.)的无球面像差的人工晶状体的假晶状体眼中的球差,视觉性能和伪适应性。和KS-1(Cannon Staar Inc.)的球形IOL。方法:将总共196例白内障手术患者随机分配到一只眼中接受三种IOL之一。术后3个月测量球差,最佳矫正远视力(BCFVA),远距矫正近视力(DCNVA),对比敏感度,眩光敏感度和假适应性。结果:术后3个月,使用Tecnis Z9001 IOL,Akreos AO IOL和KS-1 IOL的眼睛的5 mm瞳孔大小的平均球差Z(4,0)为0.022 +/- 0.071 microm,0.141 +/-分别为0.070微米和0.210 +/- 0.108微米(P <0.001),并且在两个非球面光器件中也发现了显着差异(P <0.001)。与球形KS-1 IOL相比,Tecnis Z9001 IOL显着提高了4.0度,2.5度视角下的对比度灵敏度和4.0度,2.5度,2.0度,1.6度视角下的眩光灵敏度,Akreos AO IOL显着提高了4.0倍对比度2.5度和4.0度,2.5度,2.0度时的眩光敏感度,但在任何视角下,两个非球面IOL之间没有统计学意义的差异。此外,三个IOL在BCFVA,DCNVA和伪住宿方面没有显着差异。结论:所有研究的人工晶体均可提供良好的视力。与球面IOL相比,两个非球面IOL均可显着降低球面像差并改善视觉性能,而不会降低伪调节幅度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号