...
首页> 外文期刊>Comparative Medicine >Tear Production Rate in a Mouse Model of Dry Eye According to the Phenol Red Thread and Endodontic Absorbent Paper Point Tear Tests
【24h】

Tear Production Rate in a Mouse Model of Dry Eye According to the Phenol Red Thread and Endodontic Absorbent Paper Point Tear Tests

机译:根据酚红线和牙髓吸收纸点撕裂试验得出的干眼小鼠模型的撕裂发生率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study compared the endodontic absorbent paper point test (EAPTT) and the phenol red thread test (PRTT) for the assessment of tear production rate in a mouse model of dry eye. Fourteen BALB/c breed female mice were allocated into experimental and control groups of equal number. For 6 wk, the experimental group was kept in dry-eye cabinets, whereas the control group was kept in normal cages under ambient conditions. In both groups, the tear production rate was measured by using EAPTT and PRTT before the study, at study baseline, and at weeks 2, 4, and 6. Tear production at weeks 2, 4, and 6 differed significantly between groups and tests. Evaluating the groups independently in terms of the test technique revealed significant differences in teat production rate between the 2 groups at the same measurement times. Due to their persistent exposure to evaporative stress factors, the tear production rate of the mice in the dry-eye cabinet was consistently lower than that of controls. Unlike PRTT, EAPTT can be readily applied to the small globes of laboratory animals without the need for forceps, thus saving time and effort. In addition, EAPTT was practical and imposed no undue stress on the mice, due to the test material's firmer structure. Therefore, compared with PRTT, EAPTT is safer and more reliable for the diagnosis of dry-eye syndrome in mice.
机译:这项研究比较了牙髓吸收纸点试验(EAPTT)和酚红线试验(PRTT)在干眼小鼠模型中的泪液产生率评估。将十四只BALB / c繁殖雌性小鼠分为相同数量的实验组和对照组。在6周内,实验组被放在干眼柜中,而对照组则在环境条件下被放在正常的笼子里。在两组中,在研究前,研究基线以及第2、4和6周使用EAPTT和PRTT测量泪液产生率。两组和试验之间第2、4和6周的泪液产生显着不同。根据测试技术对各组进行独立评估,发现在相同的测量时间下,两组之间的乳头生产率有显着差异。由于它们持续暴露在蒸发压力因素下,干眼柜中小鼠的眼泪产生率始终低于对照组。与PRTT不同,EAPTT可以容易地应用于实验动物的小球体,而无需镊子,从而节省了时间和精力。此外,EAPTT非常实用,并且由于测试材料的牢固结构,因此不会对小鼠造成过大的压力。因此,与PRTT相比,EAPTT对于小鼠干眼症的诊断更加安全可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号