首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >Faculty status for librarians: force-fitting into an inappropriate mold or not?
【24h】

Faculty status for librarians: force-fitting into an inappropriate mold or not?

机译:图书馆员的教职地位:是否适合不适合的模具?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Much has been written on the status of academic librarians. If one were to compile a bibliography on the topic, it would be reasonable to expect at least 250 entries. Based on a casual observation of the literature, many of the articles published on the topic occurred in the 1970s and 1980s. Fewer articles have been published on the status of academic librarians in the 1990s than in the 1980s. Are our colleagues having second thoughts about achieving and/or maintaining faculty status? I think not. Notwithstanding the tremendous growing pressures on academic librarians to meet higher expectations of users, it is my opinion that most librarians with faculty status still firmly believe in the virtues associated with this standing.
机译:关于学术图书馆馆员地位的文章很多。如果要编写关于该主题的书目,则合理的做法是期望至少有250个条目。基于对文献的随意观察,有关该主题的许多文章发表于1970年代和1980年代。 1990年代发表的关于大学图书馆员地位的文章比1980年代少。我们的同事对获得和/或保持教师地位是否有其他想法?我觉得不是。尽管对满足要求的更高期望的大学图书馆员的压力越来越大,但我认为,大多数具有教师地位的图书馆员仍然坚信与这一地位相关的美德。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号