【24h】

The relevance effect and conditionals

机译:关联效应和条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

More than a decade of research has found strong evidence for P(if A, then C) = P(C vertical bar A) ("the Equation"). We argue, however, that this hypothesis provides an overly simplified picture due to its inability to account for relevance. We manipulated relevance in the evaluation of the probability and acceptability of indicative conditionals and found that relevance moderates the effect of P(CIA). This corroborates the Default and Penalty Hypothesis put forward in this paper. Finally, the probability and acceptability of concessive conditionals ("Even if A, then still C") were investigated and it was found that the Equation provides a better account of concessive conditionals than of indicatives across relevance manipulations. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:十多年来的研究发现,有很强的证据表明P(如果A,则C)= P(C竖线A)(“等式”)。但是,我们认为,由于该假设无法说明相关性,因此该假设提供了过于简化的情况。我们在指示性条件的可能性和可接受性评估中操纵了相关性,发现相关性可以缓和P(CIA)的影响。这证实了本文提出的违约和罚则假说。最后,研究了优惠条件的可能性和可接受性(“即使是A,然后仍然是C”),发现与相关操作相比,该方程式对优惠条件的说明要好得多。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号