...
首页> 外文期刊>Cognition, Technology & Work >Trait, state or artefact? Assessing experts' regulatory focus in nuclear power plant control
【24h】

Trait, state or artefact? Assessing experts' regulatory focus in nuclear power plant control

机译:性格,状态还是人为因素?评估专家对核电厂控制的监管重点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We apply the theory of regulatory focus in the field of nuclear power plant (NPP) control. The first pilot study was conducted at the German simulator centre for NPPs. Here, we tested the influence of accident training lessons on the experts' regulatory focus. In a second study, we tested and validated two chronically regulatory focus questionnaires to decide which measurement would be more suitable for future research. The Work Regulatory Focus scale was translated into German, and the Regulatory Concerns Questionnaire was adapted to a work environment. The combined evidence of both studies shows that the regulatory focus of the experts does not change during the training lessons. Study 2 shows that both questionnaires were able to adequately measure the regulatory focus, but that they produce artificially contradictory outcomes that could be misleading. Recommendations and considerations for using the questionnaires are provided. Theoretical and practical implications on the influence of experts' regulatory focus on working and decision-making behaviour using standard procedures in NPP control are given.
机译:我们将监管重点理论应用于核电厂(NPP)控制领域。第一次试点研究是在德国核电厂模拟器中心进行的。在这里,我们测试了事故培训课程对专家监管重点的影响。在第二项研究中,我们测试并验证了两个长期监管重点调查问卷,以确定哪种测量更适合将来的研究。工作监管重点量表已翻译成德语,并且监管关注问卷已针对工作环境进行了调整。两项研究的综合证据表明,在培训课程中,专家的监管重点不会改变。研究2表明,两个调查表都能够充分衡量监管重点,但是它们产生的人为矛盾的结果可能会产生误导。提供了使用问卷的建议和注意事项。给出了在NPP控制中使用标准程序对专家监管重点对工作和决策行为的影响产生的理论和实践意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号