首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >Deal or No Deal? Evaluating Big Deals and Their Journals
【24h】

Deal or No Deal? Evaluating Big Deals and Their Journals

机译:成还是不成?评估大交易及其期刊

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents methods to develop metrics that compare Big Deal journal packages and the journals within those packages. Deal-level metrics guide selection of a Big Deal for termination. Journal-level metrics guide selection of individual subscriptions from journals previously provided by a terminated deal.The paper argues that, while the proposed metrics provide helpful quantitative data for comparative analysis, selection of individual subscriptions must also involve informed judgment about alibrary's subject coverage needs and alternative sources of access. The paper also discusses how replacing a Big Deal with a reduced number of individual subscriptions may affect the collections budget, use of other resources, and interlibrary loan.
机译:本文介绍了一些方法,可用于比较Big Deal期刊软件包和其中的期刊的指标。交易级别指标可指导您选择要终止的大交易。期刊级别的指标指导从终止交易之前提供的期刊中选择单个订阅。本文认为,尽管所提出的指标为比较分析提供了有用的定量数据,但单个订阅的选择还必须涉及对图书馆主题覆盖范围需求的明智判断,以及替代访问来源。本文还讨论了用数量减少的个人订阅替换“大笔交易”如何影响馆藏预算,其他资源的使用和馆际互借。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号