...
首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience >Stimulus conflict triggers behavioral avoidance
【24h】

Stimulus conflict triggers behavioral avoidance

机译:刺激冲突触发行为回避

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

According to a recent extension of the conflict-monitoring theory, conflict between two competing response tendencies is registered as an aversive event and triggers a motivation to avoid the source of conflict. In the present study, we tested this assumption. Over five experiments, we examined whether conflict is associated with an avoidance motivation and whether stimulus conflict or response conflict triggers an avoidance tendency. Participants first performed a color Stroop task. In a subsequent motivation test, participants responded to Stroop stimuli with approach-and avoidance-related lever movements. These results showed that Stroop-conflict stimuli increased the frequency of avoidance responses in a free-choice motivation test, and also increased the speed of avoidance relative to approach responses in a forced-choice test. High and low proportions of response conflict in the Stroop task had no effect on avoidance in the motivation test. Avoidance of conflict was, however, obtained even with new conflict stimuli that had not been presented before in a Stroop task, and when the Stroop task was replaced with an unrelated filler task. Taken together, these results suggest that stimulus conflict is sufficient to trigger avoidance.
机译:根据冲突监视理论的最新扩展,两个竞争响应趋势之间的冲突被记录为厌恶事件,并触发了避免冲突根源的动机。在本研究中,我们测试了这个假设。在五个实验中,我们检查了冲突是否与回避动机有关,以及刺激冲突或反应冲突是否触发了回避趋势。参与者首先执行了彩色Stroop任务。在随后的动机测试中,参与者通过接近和避免相关的杠杆动作对Stroop刺激做出反应。这些结果表明,Stroop-冲突刺激在自由选择动机测试中增加了回避反应的频率,并且在强迫选择测试中相对于进场反应也增加了回避的速度。 Stroop任务中响应冲突的高低比例对动机测试中的回避没有影响。但是,即使在Stroop任务中以前没有出现过新的冲突刺激,并且用不相关的填充任务替换了Stroop任务,也可以避免冲突。两者合计,这些结果表明,刺激冲突足以触发回避。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号