首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience >'Smart inhibition': electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching.
【24h】

'Smart inhibition': electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching.

机译:“智能抑制”:在任务切换过程中抑制产生冲突的任务规则的电生理证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A major challenge for task switching is maintaining a balance between high task readiness and effectively ignoring irrelevant task rules. This calls for finely tuned inhibition that targets only the source of interference without adversely influencing other task-related representations. The authors show that irrelevant task rules generating response conflict are inhibited, causing their inefficient execution on the next trial (indicating the presence of competitor rule suppression[CRS];Meiran, Hsieh, & Dimov, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 992-1002, 2010). To determine whether CRS influences task rules, rather than target stimuli or responses, the authors focused on the processing of the task cue before the target stimulus was presented and before the response could be chosen. As was predicted, CRS was found in the event-related potentials in two time windows during task cue processing. It was also found in three time windows after target presentation. Source localization analyses suggest the involvement of the right dorsal prefrontal cortex in all five time windows.
机译:任务切换的一个主要挑战是在高任务准备和有效忽略无关任务规则之间保持平衡。这就要求进行微调的抑制,该抑制只针对干扰源,而不会对其他与任务相关的表示产生不利影响。作者表明,无关紧要的任务规则产生了响应冲突,因此被禁止,从而导致它们在下一次试验中的执行效率低下(表明存在竞争者规则抑制[CRS]; Meiran,Hsieh和Dimov,《实验心理学杂志:学习,记忆和认知》 ,36,992-1002,2010)。为了确定CRS是否影响任务规则,而不是目标刺激或反应,作者着重于在提出目标刺激之前和选择反应之前对任务提示的处理。如预料的那样,在任务提示处理期间的两个时间窗口中,与事件相关的电位中都发现了CRS。在目标演示后的三个时间窗口中也发现了它。来源本地化分析表明,在所有五个时间窗中均涉及右侧背前额叶皮层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号