首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental medicine >Impulse oscillometry: an alternative modality to the conventional pulmonary function test to categorise obstructive pulmonary disorders.
【24h】

Impulse oscillometry: an alternative modality to the conventional pulmonary function test to categorise obstructive pulmonary disorders.

机译:脉冲示波法:常规肺功能检查的另一种方法,用于对阻塞性肺部疾病进行分类。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Impulse oscillometry (IOS) was introduced as an alternative modality to the conventional pulmonary function test (cPFT) to test lung mechanics. The objective of this study is to assess the use of IOS as an alternative, or in conjunction with cPFT, to categorise an obstructive respiratory disorder as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma. Patients referred to the PFT laboratory, with different diagnoses of obstructive airways disorders, completed a standardised respiratory questionnaire prior to testing. All recruited subjects completed both modalities of PFT. A total of 146 patients were included. The overall mean age was 51+/-18.4 SD. The majority were non-smokers (68.7%). A standardised diagnosis of asthma was found for 51 subjects, while COPD was diagnosed in 36 subjects and 59 subjects were categorised as normal. The sensitivity of IOS in relation to asthma was 31.3% and 19.6% for cPFT. Among cases of COPD, the cPFT had better sensitivity (47.4%) than IOS (38.95%). The specificity was comparable for IOS and cPFT in relation to asthma and COPD. IOS had better sensitivity (45.8%) in detecting normal subjects than cPFT (28.8%), while specificity was comparable (80.5% and 86.2%, respectively). IOS may replace cPFT where the latter cannot be carried out due to feasibility or lack of cooperation. It can, however, discriminate between diseased and non-diseased subjects.
机译:脉冲示波法(IOS)被引入作为常规肺功能测试(cPFT)的替代方式,以测试肺力学。这项研究的目的是评估将IOS用作替代方案或与cPFT结合使用,以将阻塞性呼吸系统疾病分类为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘。转诊至PFT实验室的患者,对不同的阻塞性气道疾病进行了不同的诊断,在测试之前完成了标准化的呼吸调查问卷。所有招募的受试者都完成了PFT的两种方式。总共包括146名患者。总平均年龄为51 +/- 18.4 SD。大多数是不吸烟者(68.7%)。对51名受试者进行了标准的哮喘诊断,而在36名受试者中诊断出COPD,将59名受试者归类为正常。对于cPFT,IOS对哮喘的敏感性为31.3%和19.6%。在COPD病例中,cPFT的敏感性(47.4%)优于IOS(38.95%)。对于哮喘和COPD,IOS和cPFT的特异性相当。 IOS在检测正常受试者方面具有比cPFT(28.8%)更好的灵敏度(45.8%),而特异性相当(分别为80.5%和86.2%)。如果由于可行性或缺乏合作而无法执行cPFT,则IOS可以代替cPFT。但是,它可以区分患病者和非患病者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号