...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Utilization of and charges for robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer
【24h】

Utilization of and charges for robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer

机译:子宫内膜癌机器人,腹腔镜手术与开放手术的使用和收费

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and Objectives To analyze the utilization and hospital charges associated with robotic (RS) versus laparoscopic (LS) versus open surgery (OS) in endometrial cancer patients. Methods Hospital discharge data were extracted from Florida Agency for Health Care Administration between October 2008 and December 2009. Results Of 2,247 patients (median age: 64 years), 29% had RS, 10% had LS, and 61% had OS. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.6, 1.8, and 3.9 days for RS, LS, and OS, respectively (P < 0.001). The median hospital charge was $51,569, $37,202, and $36,492, for RS, LS, and OS (P < 0.001), with operating room charges ($22,600, $13,684, and $11,272) accounting for the major difference. Robotic surgery utilization increased by 11% (23-34%) over time. Conclusions In this statewide analysis of endometrial cancer patients, the utilization of robotic surgery increased and is associated with higher hospital charges compared to laparoscopic and open procedures.
机译:背景与目的分析子宫内膜癌患者中与机器人(RS)相对于腹腔镜(LS)相对于开放手术(OS)的利用率和医院收费。方法从2008年10月至2009年12月间从佛罗里达州卫生行政管理总署提取出院数据。结果2247例患者(中位年龄:64岁)中,RS占29%,LS占10%,OS占61%。 RS,LS和OS的平均住院天数分别为1.6、1.8和3.9天(P <0.001)。 RS,LS和OS的住院费用中位数为51,569美元,37,202美元和36,492美元(P <0.001),其中手术室费用(22,600美元,13,684美元和11,272美元)是主要区别。随着时间的流逝,机器人手术的利用率提高了11%(23-34%)。结论在这项对子宫内膜癌患者的全州分析中,与腹腔镜手术和开放手术相比,机器人手术的使用有所增加,并且与更高的医院费用相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号