首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >A pilot study to examine the tolerability and device preference in type 1 diabetes of insulin aspart administered by insujet compared with subcutaneous injection
【24h】

A pilot study to examine the tolerability and device preference in type 1 diabetes of insulin aspart administered by insujet compared with subcutaneous injection

机译:一项前瞻性研究,研究通过胰岛素注射与皮下注射比较1型胰岛素门冬胰岛素对1型糖尿病的耐受性和设备偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Jet injectors allow needle-free insulin delivery. The study objective was to compare the tolerability and device preference of subcutaneous insulin aspart delivery by jet injector (InsuJet?; European Pharma Group, Schiphol-Rijk, The Netherlands) with pen injection in an open-label, randomized, crossover pilot study. Subjects and Methods: Ten participants with type 1 diabetes underwent two meal tolerance tests 1 week apart. Plasma glucose and serum insulin levels were sampled from 10 min preceding to 240 min after insulin aspart administration by InsuJet or FlexPen? (Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd., Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia). Insulin dose was calculated using participants' insulin-to-carbohydrate ratios. Immediately after insulin administration, participants drank 500 mL of Ensure? (Abbott Australasia Pty. Ltd., Botany, NSW, Australia) (providing 2,240 kJ of energy, 18.6 g of protein, 96 g of carbohydrate, and 3 g of fat). Results: In this small pilot study, the devices were similar in glucose excursion (median [quartile 1, quartile 3], InsuJet vs. FlexPen, 9.4 [4.8, 12.8] vs. 8.1 [5.4, 10.6] mmol/L; P=0.43), in the area under the glucose concentration-time curve for 0-240 min corrected for baseline glucose level (InsuJet vs. FlexPen, 1,230 [623, 2,012] vs. 1,175 [91, 1,774] mmol·min/L; P=0.4), and in insulin absorption over the 240-min period. Devices were similar for participant preference and relative injection pain. Conclusions: Subcutaneous jet injection of aspart insulin was well tolerated.
机译:背景:喷射注射器允许无针胰岛素输送。该研究的目的是在开放标签,随机,交叉的先导研究中比较喷射注射器(InsuJet?; European Pharma Group,Schiphol-Rijk,荷兰)与笔式注射皮下注射门冬胰岛素的耐受性和设备偏好。受试者与方法:十名1型糖尿病参与者每1周接受两次耐餐试验。在通过InsuJet或FlexPen?进行门冬胰岛素给药后的10分钟之前至240分钟之前,采集血浆葡萄糖和血清胰岛素水平。 (Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty.Ltd。,澳大利亚新南威尔士州鲍克汉姆山)。使用参与者的胰岛素与碳水化合物比率计算胰岛素剂量。服用胰岛素后,参与者立即喝了500毫升的Ensure? (澳大利亚新南威尔士州植物园的雅培大洋洲有限公司)(提供2240 kJ能量,18.6 g蛋白质,96 g碳水化合物和3 g脂肪)。结果:在这项小型先导研究中,设备的葡萄糖偏移相似(中位[四分位数1,四分位数3],InsuJet与FlexPen的比较,分别为9.4 [4.8,12.8] mmol / L,8.1 [5.4,10.6] mmol / L; P = 0.43),在0-240分钟的葡萄糖浓度-时间曲线下的区域校正了基线葡萄糖水平(InsuJet与FlexPen,1,230 [623,2,012]与1,175 [91,1,774] mmol·min / L; P = 0.4),并在240分钟内吸收胰岛素。参与者偏好和相对注射疼痛的设备相似。结论:皮下喷射注射门冬胰岛素具有良好的耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号