...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Editorial: Let's talk about Level IV: The bones of a good retrospective case series.
【24h】

Editorial: Let's talk about Level IV: The bones of a good retrospective case series.

机译:社论:让我们谈谈IV级:一个好的回顾案例系列的精髓。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

"A good retrospective case series." An oxymoron? Not necessarily. The retrospective case series, or Level IV study, has always been, and remains today, the most common research design in our literature. When I first looked at this topic more than 10 years ago, nearly four in five orthopaedic studies were retrospective [3]. Although it is trendy in evidence-based medicine circles to turn one's nose up at the humble case series, there is no avoiding them, and, in fact, a majority of the 100 most-commonly cited ortho paedic articles are Level IV studies [2].
机译:“一个很好的回顾案例系列。”矛盾情绪?不必要。回顾性病例系列或IV级研究一直是并且至今仍是我们文献中最常见的研究设计。十多年前,当我第一次研究这个话题时,有五分之四的骨科研究是回顾性的[3]。尽管在循证医学界很流行在不起眼的病例系列中大声疾呼,但仍不能避免,事实上,在100篇最常用的矫形医学文章中,大多数是IV级研究[2]。 ]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号