...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Clarification of Issues Raised in the Editorial 'A New Age for Cancer Information Seeking: Are We Better Off Now?'
【24h】

Clarification of Issues Raised in the Editorial 'A New Age for Cancer Information Seeking: Are We Better Off Now?'

机译:澄清社论“寻求癌症信息的新时代:我们现在更好了吗?”中提出的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I read with great interest the editorial by Paul R. Helft, MD about my article "Frustrated and Confused: The American Public Rates its Cancer-Related Information-Seeking Experiences." My coauthors and I are very appreciative that the journal considered our findings worthy of an editorial. However, I did come across a few inaccuracies in the editorial that I discuss below and provide needed clarification.On the first page, the editorial states"... the sampled cohort may not be educationally representative of US adults in general, as the 2006 US Census data suggests that more than 80% of US adults over the age of 20 are high school graduates, whereas only 32% of the HINTS survey cohort reported having graduated from high school."
机译:我非常感兴趣地阅读了医学博士Paul R. Helft的社论,关于我的文章“沮丧和困惑:美国公众对与癌症相关的信息搜寻经验的评价”。我和我的合著者非常感谢该期刊认为我们的发现值得社论。但是,我确实在下面讨论的社论中发现了一些错误之处,并提供了必要的说明。在第一页上,社论指出“ ...样本人群在教育上一般不能代表美国成年人,例如2006年美国人口普查数据表明,在20岁以上的美国成年人中,有80%以上是高中毕业生,而HINTS调查队列中只有32%的人报告说已经高中毕业。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号