...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Results of the Medications At Transitions and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) study: an analysis of medication reconciliation errors and risk factors at hospital admission.
【24h】

Results of the Medications At Transitions and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) study: an analysis of medication reconciliation errors and risk factors at hospital admission.

机译:过渡期和临床移交药物的研究结果(MATCH):对入院时药物对账错误和危险因素的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine risk factors and potential harm associated with medication errors at hospital admission. METHODS: Study pharmacist and hospital-physician medication histories were compared with medication orders to identify unexplained history and order discrepancies in 651 adult medicine service inpatients with 5,701 prescription medications. Discrepancies resulting in order changes were considered errors. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association of patient demographic and clinical characteristics including patients' number of pre-admission prescription medications, pharmacies, prescribing physicians and medication changes; and presentation of medication bottles or lists. These factors were tested after controlling for patient demographics, admitting service and severity of illness. RESULTS: Over one-third of study patients (35.9%) experienced 309 order errors; 85% of patients had errors originate in medication histories, and almost half were omissions. Cardiovascular agents were commonly in error (29.1%). If undetected, 52.4% of order errors were rated as potentially requiring increased monitoring or intervention to preclude harm; 11.7% were rated as potentially harmful. In logistic regression analysis, patient's age > or = 65 [odds ratio (OR), 2.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-4.30] and number of prescription medications (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.29) were significantly associated with errors potentially requiring monitoring or causing harm. Presenting a medication list (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.19-0.63) or bottles (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.27-1.10) at admission was beneficial. CONCLUSION: Over one-third of the patients in our study had a medication error at admission, and of these patients, 85% had errors originate in their medication histories. Attempts to improve the accuracy of medication histories should focus on older patients with a large number of medications. Primary care physicians and other clinicians should help patients utilize and maintain complete, accurate and understandable medication lists.
机译:背景:本研究旨在确定住院时与用药错误相关的危险因素和潜在危害。方法:将研究药剂师和医院医师的用药历史与用药顺序进行比较,以识别651名使用5701种处方药的成年医学服务住院患者的无法解释的病史和顺序差异。导致订单更改的差异被视为错误。 Logistic回归用于分析患者人口统计学特征与临床特征之间的关系,包括患者的入院前处方药数量,药房,开药医生和药物变化;药品瓶或清单的介绍。在控制了患者的人口统计资料,准入服务和疾病严重程度之后,对这些因素进行了测试。结果:超过三分之一的研究患者(35.9%)经历了309次订购错误; 85%的患者有错误是由药物史引起的,几乎一半是遗漏。心血管疾病通常是错误的(29.1%)。如果未发现,则将52.4%的订单错误定为可能需要加强监控或干预以防止伤害; 11.7%被评为潜在有害物质。在逻辑回归分析中,患者年龄>或= 65 [优势比(OR),2.17; 95%置信区间(CI)为1.09-4.30]和处方药的数量(OR为1.21; 95%CI为1.14-1.29)与可能需要监控或造成伤害的错误密切相关。入院时出示药物清单(OR,0.35; 95%CI,0.19-0.63)或瓶装(OR,0.55; 95%CI,0.27-1.10)是有益的。结论:我们研究中超过三分之一的患者在入院时出现用药错误,其中这些患者中有85%的错误来自于他们的用药史。尝试提高用药史的准确性应将重点放在拥有大量药物的老年患者身上。初级保健医生和其他临床医生应帮助患者使用和维护完整,准确和可理解的药物清单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号