首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >International perspectives on general internal medicine and the case for 'globalization' of a discipline.
【24h】

International perspectives on general internal medicine and the case for 'globalization' of a discipline.

机译:关于一般内科和一门学科“全球化”的国际观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

General internal medicine (GIM) has flourished in the United States (U.S.). Unlike other subspecialties of internal medicine, however, GIM's evolution has not been global in scope, but rather appears to have occurred in isolation within countries. Here, we describe international models of GIM from Canada, Switzerland, Australia/New Zealand, Argentina, and Japan, and compare these with the U.S. model. There are notable differences in the typical clinical roles assumed by General Internists across these 7 countries, but also important overlap in clinical and academic domains. Despite this overlap, there has been a relative lack of contact among General Internists from these and other countries at a truly international GIM meeting; the time is now for increased international exchange and the "globalization" of GIM.
机译:普通内科(GIM)在美国(美国)蓬勃发展。但是,与其他内部医学子专业不同,GIM的发展范围不是全球性的,而是在国家内部孤立地发生的。在这里,我们描述了来自加拿大,瑞士,澳大利亚/新西兰,阿根廷和日本的GIM国际模型,并将其与美国模型进行了比较。在这7个国家中,普通实习医生承担的典型临床角色存在显着差异,但在临床和学术领域也存在重要的重叠之处。尽管存在这种重叠,但在真正的国际GIM会议上,来自这些国家和其他国家的普通实习医生之间仍然缺乏联系。现在是时候加强国际交流和GIM的“全球化”了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号