...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Measuring patients' experiences with individual primary care physicians. Results of a statewide demonstration project.
【24h】

Measuring patients' experiences with individual primary care physicians. Results of a statewide demonstration project.

机译:与个别初级保健医生一起评估患者的经历。全州示范项目的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Measuring and reporting patients' experiences with health plans has been routine for several years. There is now substantial interest in measuring patients' experiences with individual physicians, but numerous concerns remain. OBJECTIVE: The Massachusetts Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey Project was a statewide demonstration project designed to test the feasibility and value of measuring patients' experiences with individual primary care physicians and their practices. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey administered to a statewide sample by mail and telephone (May-August 2002). PATIENTS: Adult patients from 5 commerical health plans and Medicaid sampled from the panels of 215 generalist physicians at 67 practice sites (n=9,625). MEASUREMENTS: Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey produces 11 summary measures of patients' experiences across 2 domains: quality of physician-patient interactions and organizational features of care. Physician-level reliability was computed for all measures, and variance components analysis was used to determine the influence of each level of the system (physician, site, network organization, plan) on each measure. Risk of misclassifying individual physicians was evaluated under varying reporting frameworks. RESULTS: All measures except 2 achieved physician-level reliability of at least 0.70 with samples of 45 patients per physician, and several exceeded 0.80. Physicians and sites accounted for the majority of system-related variance on all measures, with physicians accounting for the majority on all interaction quality accounting for the largest share on "organizational" measures (range: 44.8% to 81.1%). Health plans accounted for neglible variance (<3%) on all measures. Reporting frameworks and principles for assuring misclassification risk < or =2.5% were identified. CONCLUSIONS: With considerable national attention on the importance of patient-centered care, this project demonstrates the feasibility of obtaining highly reliable measures of patients' experiences with individual physicians and practices. The analytic findings underscore the validity and importance of looking beyond health plans to individual physicians and sites as we seek to improve health care quality.
机译:背景:测量和报告患者的健康计划经验已经有几年了。现在对衡量患者与个别医生的经历非常感兴趣,但是仍然存在许多问题。目的:马萨诸塞州非卧床护理经验调查项目是一项全州范围的示范项目,旨在测试测量患者与初级保健医生及其实践的经验的可行性和价值。设计:通过邮件和电话对全州样本进行横断面调查(2002年5月至8月)。患者:来自5个商业卫生计划的成年患者和Medicaid样品,来自67个实践场所的215名全科医生组成的小组(n = 9,625)。测量:动态护理经验调查在11个领域中总结了11个患者经验的量度:医患互动质量和护理的组织特征。计算所有措施的医师级别可靠性,并使用方差成分分析来确定系统每个层次(医师,站点,网络组织,计划)对每种措施的影响。在不同的报告框架下评估了个别医生分类错误的风险。结果:除2项措施外,所有措施均获得了至少0.70的医师水平可靠性,每位医师45位患者的样本中,有几项超过0.80。在所有措施中,与系统相关的方差中,医师和现场所占比例最大,而在所有“交互性”质量中,医师所占比例最大,“组织”措施中所占比例最大(范围:44.8%至81.1%)。卫生计划在所有衡量指标中均忽略了差异(<3%)。确定了确保误分类风险≤2.5%的报告框架和原则。结论:该项目在全国范围内对以患者为中心的护理的重要性给予了广泛关注,该项目证明了获得高度可靠的措施来评估患者在个别医生和实践中的经历的可行性。分析结果强调了在我们寻求改善医疗保健质量时,超出医疗计划范围之外的对个别医生和现场的有效性和重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号