首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Validation of the PIII CLI risk score for the prediction of amputation-free survival in patients undergoing infrainguinal autogenous vein bypass for critical limb ischemia.
【24h】

Validation of the PIII CLI risk score for the prediction of amputation-free survival in patients undergoing infrainguinal autogenous vein bypass for critical limb ischemia.

机译:PIII CLI风险评分的验证可用于预测发生自发性自体静脉旁路治疗严重肢体缺血的患者的无截肢生存率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The PREVENT III (PIII) critical limb ischemia (CLI) risk score is a simple, published tool derived from the PIII randomized clinical trial that can be used for estimating amputation-free survival (AFS) in CLI patients considered for infrainguinal bypass (IB). The current study sought to validate this risk stratification model using data from the prospectively collected Vascular Study Group of Northern New England (VSGNNE). METHOD: We calculated the PIII CLI risk score for 1166 patients undergoing IB with autogenous vein by 59 surgeons at 11 hospitals between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2007. Points (pts) were assigned to each patient for the presence of dialysis (4 pts), tissue loss (3 pts), age >or=75 (2 pts), and coronary artery disease (CAD) (1 pt). Baseline hematocrit was not included due to a large proportion of missing values. Total scores were used to stratify each patient into low-risk (or=8 pts) categories. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate AFS for the three risk groups. Log-rank test was used for intergroup comparisons. To assess validation, comparison to the PIII derivation and validation sets was performed. RESULT: Stratification of the VSGNNE patients by risk category yielded three significantly different estimates for 1-year AFS (86.4%, 74.0%, and 56.1%, for low-, med-, and high-risk groups). Intergroup comparison demonstrated precise discrimination (P < .0001). For a given risk category (low, med, or high), the 1-year AFS estimates in the VSGNNE dataset were consistent with those observed in the previously published PIII derivation set (85.9%, 73.0%, and 44.6%, respectively), PIII validation set (87.7%, 63.7%, and 45.0%, respectively), and retrospective multicenter validation set (86.3%, 70.1%, and 47.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The PIII CLI risk score has now been both internally and externally validated by testing it against the outcomes of 3286 CLI patients who underwent autogenous vein bypass at 94 institutions by a diverse array of physicians (three independent cohorts of patients). This tool provides a simple and reliable method to risk stratify CLI patients being considered for IB. At initial consultation, calculation of the PIII CLI risk score can reliably stratify patients according to their risk of death or major amputation at 1 year.
机译:目的:PREVENT III(PIII)危重肢体缺血(CLI)风险评分是一种简单的,已发布的工具,该工具源自PIII随机临床试验,可用于评估考虑进行经宫腔旁路手术的CLI患者的无截肢生存率(AFS)( IB)。本研究试图使用前瞻性收集的新英格兰北部血管研究小组(VSGNNE)的数据来验证这种风险分层模型。方法:我们计算了2003年1月1日至2007年12月31日期间11家医院的59位外科医生对1166例接受自体静脉IB的IB患者的PIII CLI风险评分。将每个患者的透析点数(pts)分配给患者( 4分),组织损失(3分),年龄≥75岁(2分)和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)(1分)。由于大部分遗漏值,未包括基线血细胞比容。使用总评分将每位患者分为低风险(<或= 3分),中风险(4-7分)和高风险(>或= 8分)类别。 Kaplan-Meier方法用于计算三个风险组的AFS。对数秩检验用于组间比较。为了评估验证,与PIII派生和验证集进行了比较。结果:按风险类别对VSGNNE患者进行分层,得出1年AFS的三种估计值存在明显差异(低,中,高风险组分别为86.4%,74.0%和56.1%)。组间比较显示出精确的辨别力(P <.0001)。对于给定的风险类别(低,中或高),VSGNNE数据集中的1年AFS估计值与先前发布的PIII派生集中所观察到的一致(分别为85.9%,73.0%和44.6%), PIII验证集(分别为87.7%,63.7%和45.0%)和回顾性多中心验证集(分别为86.3%,70.1%和47.8%)。结论:通过对94名机构的3286名CLI患者进行了自体静脉搭桥手术,PIII CLI风险评分现已通过内部和外部验证,这些患者在94个机构中接受了各种医师的自体静脉搭桥手术(三组独立的患者)。该工具提供了一种简单可靠的方法来对正在考虑进行IB的CLI患者进行风险分层。初步咨询时,PIII CLI风险评分的计算可以根据患者在1年时死亡或大面积截肢的风险可靠地进行分层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号