首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques.
【24h】

Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques.

机译:腹主动脉瘤腔内修复后2型内漏的治疗:经动脉和经腰椎技术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The exact significance of collateral endoleaks is unknown and a topic of great debate. Because of this uncertainty, some physicians choose to watch and wait while others aggressively treat these leaks. The purpose of this investigation was the evaluation of the efficacy of the two techniques used in the treatment of collateral endoleaks that occur after endovascular aneurysm repair. METHODS: Patients with 33 angiographically proven type 2 endoleaks underwent treatment with either transarterial inferior mesenteric artery embolization (n = 20) or direct translumbar embolization (n = 13) during an 18-month period. Embolization success was defined as resolution of endoleak on all subsequent computed tomography angiogram results. The likelihood of embolization failure between the two treatments was expressed as a risk ratio and was compared with Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Sixteen of 20 transarterial inferior mesenteric artery embolizations (80%) failed with recanalization of the original endoleak cavity over time. A single failure (8%) in the direct translumbar embolization group occurred in a patient in whom a new attachment site leak developed. The remaining 12 translumbar endoleak embolizations (92%) were successful and durable, with a median follow-up period of 254 days. The patients who underwent transarterial inferior mesenteric artery embolization were significantly more likely to have persistent endoleak than were the patients who underwent treatment with direct translumbar embolization (risk ratio, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 11.2; P =.0001). CONCLUSION: The transarterial embolization of inferior mesenteric arteries for the repair of type 2 endoleaks is ineffective and should not be performed. Direct translumbar embolization of the endoleak is effective in the elimination of type 2 leaks and should be the therapy of choice when aggressive endoleak management is indicated.
机译:目的:侧支气管内渗漏的确切意义尚不清楚,这是一个充满争议的话题。由于这种不确定性,一些医生选择观察并等待,而另一些医生则积极地治疗这些泄漏。这项研究的目的是评估用于治疗血管内动脉瘤修复后发生的侧支内渗漏的两种技术的功效。方法:在18个月的期间内,经33次血管造影证实为2型内漏的患者接受了经动脉下肠系膜动脉栓塞术(n = 20)或直接经腰动脉栓塞术(n = 13)的治疗。栓塞成功定义为所有后续计算机断层扫描血管造影结果的内漏分辨率。两种治疗之间栓塞失败的可能性表示为风险比,并与Fisher精确检验进行了比较。结果:20个经动脉下肠系膜下动脉栓塞术中有16个(80%)随着时间的流逝而对原始内漏腔进行了再通。直接经腰椎栓塞术组发生单一失败(8%)的患者发生新的附着部位泄漏。其余12例经腰部内漏栓塞术(92%)成功且持久,中位随访期为254天。经动脉下肠系膜下动脉栓塞的患者比经直接腰椎动脉栓塞治疗的患者发生持续内漏的可能性要高得多(风险比,4.6; 95%置信区间,1.9至11.2; P = .0001)。结论:肠系膜下动脉的动脉栓塞修复2型内漏是无效的,不应进行。内漏的直接经腰动脉栓塞术可有效消除2型渗漏,当需要进行积极的内漏管理时,它应该是首选的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号