首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Comparison of surgical operative experience of trainees and practicing vascular surgeons: a report from the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery.
【24h】

Comparison of surgical operative experience of trainees and practicing vascular surgeons: a report from the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery.

机译:学员与血管外科医师的外科手术操作经验比较:美国外科委员会血管外科委员会的报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The Vascular Surgery Board (VSB) of the American Board of Surgery sought to answer the following questions: what is the scope of contemporary vascular surgery practice? Do current vascular surgery residents obtain training that is appropriate for their future career expectations and for successful Board certification? How effectively do practicing vascular surgeons incorporate emerging technologies and procedures into practice? METHODS: We analyzed the operative logs submitted to the VSB by recent vascular surgery residents applying for the Vascular Surgery Qualifying Examination (QE; 2006-2009) or by practicing vascular surgeons applying for the Vascular Surgery Recertification Examination (RE; 1995-2009). The relationship between reported operative experience and performance of the QE and RE was examined. RESULTS: There has been a threefold increase in the mean number of primary cases reported by both RE and QE applicants over the past 15 years and the increase in case volume has been driven largely by an increase in the number of endovascular procedures. Endovascular procedures have been broadly incorporated into the practice of most vascular surgeons applying for recertification. The number of major open surgical cases reported by recent QE applicants has remained unchanged over the period of observation. For QE applicants, the number of endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs) has reached a plateau at approximately 50 cases, whereas the mean number of open infrarenal aneurysm repairs has decreased for both QE and RE applicants, reflecting national trends favoring EVAR. There was a significant association between case volume and performance on the QE but not on the RE. CONCLUSION: Over the past 15 years, there has been a significant increase in the total number of operative cases reported to the VSB by both QE and RE applicants. Contrary to popular belief, the volume of major open vascular surgery reported by recent vascular surgery residents has remained relatively stable since 1994. Over the same time period, endovascular procedures have been rapidly incorporated into clinical practice by the majority of vascular surgeons applying for recertification by the VSB. Current vascular surgery residents receive a rich operative experience in both open and endovascular procedures that is reflective of contemporary practice.
机译:简介:美国外科手术委员会的血管外科委员会(VSB)试图回答以下问题:当代血管外科实践的范围是什么?当前的血管外科住院医师是否获得适合其未来职业期望和成功的董事会认证的培训?执业的血管外科医师如何有效地将新兴技术和程序纳入实践?方法:我们分析了最近申请血管外科手术资格考试的血管外科住院医师(QE; 2006-2009)或通过从事血管外科医师申请血管外科手术再认证考试(RE; 1995-2009)提交给VSB的手术日志。检查了报告的手术经验与QE和RE表现之间的关系。结果:在过去的15年中,RE和QE申请人报告的原发病例平均数增加了三倍,病例数量的增加很大程度上是由血管内手术数量的增加所驱动的。大多数申请重新认证的血管外科医师已将血管内手术广泛纳入实践。最近的量化宽松申请者报告的主要开放性手术病例数在观察期间保持不变。对于QE申请者,大约50例血管内动脉瘤修复(EVARs)达到了平稳期,而QE和RE申请者开放性肾下动脉瘤的平均修复次数均下降,反映了赞成EVAR的国家趋势。量化宽松的案例数量与绩效之间存在显着的关联,而房地产市场则没有。结论:在过去的15年中,QE和RE申请人向VSB报告的手术病例总数有了显着增加。与普遍的看法相反,自1994年以来,最近的血管外科住院医师报告的主要开放性血管外科手术的数量一直保持相对稳定。在同一时期,大多数血管外科医生已将血管内手术迅速纳入临床实践,并申请重新认证。 VSB。当前的血管外科手术患者在开放和血管内手术方面都拥有丰富的手术经验,这反映了当代的实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号