...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral investigations >In vitro investigation of the performance of different restorative materials under cast circumferential clasps for removable dental prostheses
【24h】

In vitro investigation of the performance of different restorative materials under cast circumferential clasps for removable dental prostheses

机译:体外实验研究不同修复材料在可移动义齿的铸塑环形扣下的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate the behavior of different composite restorative materials under the load of cast circumferential clasps for removable dental prostheses (RDPs). Methods: In 60 human molars, standardized mesial-occlusal-distal cavities were prepared. The cavities were restored with the following materials: Definite, Tetric Ceram, SureFil, Heliomolar RO, Ariston pHc, and Oralloy, and provided with a rest seat. The rest seats were subjected to 5,000 cycles of thermal cycling and 1,200,000 masticatory cycles in a mastication simulator via cobalt-chromium circumferential clasps cast to standardized frameworks in a laboratory model designed to simulate the biomechanics of a free-end denture base. Fracture analysis of the restorations was performed by light microscopy. Before and after loading, material wear was measured with a 3D-laser scanner, and an analysis of the marginal quality was performed in an SEM at ×200 applying the replica technique. Results: No significant differences in the fracture behavior among the composite materials were found; the amalgam control group showed a significantly higher fracture resistance. Regarding the wear of the materials, the composites Definite and SureFil exhibited a behavior similar to that of amalgam. The other composites demonstrated higher wear rates. The initial marginal quality was significantly worse for Ariston pHc. The marginal adaptation decreased significantly after thermal and mechanical loading for Definite and Ariston pHc. Conclusions: In terms of the investigated aspects of mechanical performance, the tested composites seemed to be inferior to amalgam. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the ability of composite restorations to provide support for RDP clasps. Clinical relevance: The use of composites as direct restoration materials should be avoided in teeth, which serve as abutments for clasp-retained RDPs.
机译:目的:这项体外研究的目的是研究在可移动式义齿(RDP)的铸造周向扣的作用下,不同复合修复材料的性能。方法:在60颗人类磨牙中,制备标准化的近中牙-远-中牙洞。用以下材料修复型腔:Definite,Tetric Ceram,SureFil,Heliomolar RO,Ariston pHc和Oralloy,并配有休息座椅。其余座椅在咀嚼模拟器中,通过钴铬合金周向扣铸造到标准化框架中的实验室模型中,进行了5,000次热循环和1,200,000次咀嚼循环,该实验室模型旨在模拟自由端义齿基托的生物力学。通过光学显微镜对修复体进行断裂分析。装载前后,使用3D激光扫描仪测量材料磨损,并使用复制技术在200倍的SEM下对边缘质量进行分析。结果:复合材料之间的断裂行为没有发现显着差异。汞合金对照组显示出明显更高的抗断裂性。关于材料的磨损,复合材料Definite和SureFil表现出类似于汞合金的行为。其他复合材料的磨损率更高。对于Ariston pHc,初始边缘质量明显较差。在定性和阿里斯顿pHc的热负荷和机械负荷后,边缘适应性显着下降。结论:就机械性能的研究方面而言,测试的复合材料似乎不如汞合金。需要进一步的临床研究来评估复合修复体为RDP搭扣提供支持的能力。临床意义:应避免在牙齿中使用复合材料作为直接修复材料,因为它们可作为扣环固定RDP的基台。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号