首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >An investigation of the relationship between energy density and endovenous laser ablation success: does energy density matter?
【24h】

An investigation of the relationship between energy density and endovenous laser ablation success: does energy density matter?

机译:能量密度与静脉内激光消融成功率之间关系的研究:能量密度重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between energy density and the success of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 586 EVLAs were performed in a period of 35 months. Retrospective chart review was performed, and data collected included the patients' age, sex, and history of venous stripping procedures, as well as the name, laterality, and length of the treated vein segment(s) and the total energy delivered. Energy density was calculated by dividing total energy delivered (in J) by the length of vein (in cm). Energy density selection was based on the treating interventionalist's preference. Ablated segments were grouped into those treated with less than 60 J/cm, 60-80 J/cm, 81-100 J/cm, and more than 100 J/cm. Failure of EVLA was defined by recanalization of any portion of the treated vein during follow-up as assessed by duplex Doppler ultrasound examination. Failure rates were compared with the chi(2) test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: A total of 471 segments were included in the analysis with an average follow-up period of 5 months (range, 0.2-28.7 months). Overall, 11 failures were encountered, including four in the group treated with less than 60 J/cm (n = 109; 4%), two in the 60-80-J/cm group (n = 77; 3%), four in the 81-100-J/cm group (n = 169; 3%), and one in the group treated with more than 100 J/cm (n = 116; 1%). There was no statistically significant difference in failure rates among energy density ranges. CONCLUSION: EVLA has a low failure rate that is not affected by energy density.
机译:目的:评估能量密度与静脉激光消融(EVLA)治疗成功之间的关系。材料与方法:在35个月内共进行了586次EVLA。进行了回顾性图表审查,收集的数据包括患者的年龄,性别和静脉剥离手术的历史,以及所治疗的静脉段的名称,侧向性和长度以及输送的总能量。通过将输送的总能量(以J为单位)除以静脉长度(以cm为单位)来计算能量密度。能量密度的选择基于治疗干预者的偏好。消融的节段被分为那些分别以小于60 J / cm,60-80 J / cm,81-100 J / cm和大于100 J / cm处理的节段。 EVLA失败的定义是在随访过程中对接受治疗的静脉的任何部分进行再通,这是通过双重多普勒超声检查评估得出的。失败率与chi(2)测试和Wilcoxon秩和检验进行了比较。结果:分析共纳入471个节段,平均随访期为5个月(范围0.2-28.7个月)。总体而言,遇到了11个故障,其中以低于60 J / cm的治疗组中有4个(n = 109; 4%),以60-80-J / cm 2的小组中有2个故障(n = 77; 3%),其中有4个在81-100-J / cm组中(n = 169; 3%),在接受100 J / cm以上处理的组中(n = 116; 1%)。在能量密度范围内,故障率没有统计学上的显着差异。结论:EVLA的故障率低,不受能量密度的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号