...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Letter to the editor: The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study.
【24h】

Letter to the editor: The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study.

机译:致编辑的信:髋关节表面置换和大头颅THA的功能结果相同:一项随机,双盲研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Dr. Lavigne and his coauthors [2] performed a PRCT to address a question that needs to be answered urgently: can resurfacing provide superior function over conventional hip replacement for active patients that might make the reported higher risk of reoperation worthwhile?However, their power calculation was based on the premise that anything less than a 12% increase in normal walking speed would not be significant on the grounds that an earlier study had found such a difference between patients who had hip resurfacing and those with an arthritic hip [3]. This position is obtuse. The difference between the comfortable walking speeds of fit men in their 30s and 70s is only 0.13 m/second or less than 10% [1].
机译:Lavigne博士和他的合著者[2]进行了一次PRCT,以解决一个亟待解决的问题:对于活跃的患者而言,重铺表面能否提供优于传统的髋关节置换术的优越功能,可能会使再次手术的风险更高?计算的前提是,正常步行速度的任何增加均不超过12%并不重要,因为较早的一项研究发现髋关节表面置换患者和关节炎髋关节患者之间存在如此大的差异[3]。这个位置是钝的。健身男人在30年代和70年代的舒适步行速度之间的差异仅为0.13 m /秒或小于10%[1]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号