首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Optical Society of America, A. Optics, image science, and vision >Comparison of two scanning instruments to measure peripheral refraction in the human eye
【24h】

Comparison of two scanning instruments to measure peripheral refraction in the human eye

机译:两种测量人眼周边屈光度的扫描仪的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To better understand how peripheral refraction affects development of myopia in humans, specialized instruments are fundamental for precise and rapid measurements of refraction over the visual field. We compare here two prototype instruments that measure in a few seconds the peripheral refraction in the eye with high angular resolution over a range of about +-45 deg. One instrument is based on the continuous recording of Hartmann-Shack (HS) images (HS scanner) and the other is based on the photorefraction (PR) principle (PR scanner). On average, good correlations were found between the refraction results provided by the two devices, although it varied across subjects. A detailed statistical analysis of the differences between both instruments was performed based on measurements in 35 young subjects. Both instruments have advantages and disadvantages. The HS scanner also provides the high-order aberration data, while the PR scanner is more compact and has a lower cost. Both instruments are current prototypes, and further optimization is possible to make them even more suitable tools for future visual optics and myopia research and also for different ophthalmic applications.
机译:为了更好地了解周边屈光如何影响人类近视的发展,专用仪器对于在视野内精确,快速地测量屈光至关重要。我们在这里比较了两种原型仪器,它们可以在几秒钟内以大约+ -45度的范围内的高角度分辨率测量眼睛的周边折射。一种仪器基于Hartmann-Shack(HS)图像的连续记录(HS扫描仪),另一种仪器基于光折射(PR)原理(PR扫描仪)。平均而言,在两个设备提供的折射结果之间发现了良好的相关性,尽管不同对象的折射结果有所不同。根据35位年轻受试者的测量结果,对这两种仪器之间的差异进行了详细的统计分析。两种仪器都有优点和缺点。 HS扫描仪还提供高阶像差数据,而PR扫描仪更紧凑且成本更低。两种仪器都是当前的原型,进一步优化可能使它们成为将来的视觉光学和近视研究以及不同眼科应用的更合适的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号