...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Prophylactic stabilization for bone metastases, myeloma, or lymphoma: do we need to protect the entire bone? (DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2656-1).
【24h】

Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Prophylactic stabilization for bone metastases, myeloma, or lymphoma: do we need to protect the entire bone? (DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2656-1).

机译:编者按:第5点:预防骨转移,骨髓瘤或淋巴瘤的稳定性:我们需要保护整个骨骼吗? (DOI 10.1007 / s11999-012-2656-1)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The other side of the conversation is taken up by Drs. Alvi and Damron in "Prophylactic Stabilization for Bone Metastases, Myeloma, or Lymphoma: Do We Need to Protect the Entire Bone?" (DOI 10.1007/sl 1999-012-2656-1). In it, they consider the car-diopulmonary complications associated with a long intramedullary fixation, and ask whether the risk of these complications outweighs the benefit of protecting a bone from distal lesions that might or might not ever appear.
机译:对话的另一端由Drs主持。 Alvi和Damron在“预防骨转移瘤,骨髓瘤或淋巴瘤的稳定性:我们需要保护整个骨组织”中发表的文章。 (DOI 10.1007 / sl 1999-012-2656-1)。在其中,他们考虑了与长时间的髓内固定有关的心肺并发症,并询问这些并发症的风险是否超过保护骨头免受可能或可能不会出现的远端病变的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号