首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Medical Library Association : >Best methods for evaluating educational impact: a comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction.
【24h】

Best methods for evaluating educational impact: a comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction.

机译:评估教育影响的最佳方法:比较常用图书馆教学手段的功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Libraries are increasingly called upon to demonstrate student learning outcomes and the tangible benefits of library educational programs. This study reviewed and compared the efficacy of traditionally used measures for assessing library instruction, examining the benefits and drawbacks of assessment measures and exploring the extent to which knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors actually paralleled demonstrated skill levels.AN OVERVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE ON THE EVALUATION OF INFORMATION LITERACY EDUCATION ADDRESSED THESE QUESTIONS: (1) What evaluation measures are commonly used for evaluating library instruction? (2) What are the pros and cons of popular evaluation measures? (3) What are the relationships between measures of skills versus measures of attitudes and behavior? Research outcomes were used to identify relationships between measures of attitudes, behaviors, and skills, which are typically gathered via attitudinal surveys, written skills tests, or graded exercises.Results provide useful information about the efficacy of instructional evaluation methods, including showing significant disparities between attitudes, skills, and information usage behaviors. This information can be used by librarians to implement the most appropriate evaluation methods for measuring important variables that accurately demonstrate students' attitudes, behaviors, or skills.
机译:越来越多地要求图书馆展示学生的学习成果和图书馆教育计划的切实好处。这项研究回顾并比较了传统方法在评估图书馆教学,评估评估方法的利弊以及探索知识,态度和行为实际上与技能水平平行的程度方面的功效。信息文学教育针对以下问题的解答:(1)图书馆教学评估中常用的评估手段是什么? (2)大众评价手段的优缺点是什么? (3)技能测度与态度和行为测度之间有什么关系?研究成果用于识别态度,行为和技能的量度之间的关系,这些量度通常是通过态度调查,书面技能测验或分级练习来收集的,结果提供了有关教学评估方法功效的有用信息,包括显示出两者之间的显着差异。态度,技能和信息使用行为。图书馆员可以使用此信息来实施最适当的评估方法,以测量重要变量,从而准确显示学生的态度,行为或技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号