...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurophysiology >Comparison of descending volleys evoked by transcranial and epidural motor cortex stimulation in a conscious patient with bulbar pain.
【24h】

Comparison of descending volleys evoked by transcranial and epidural motor cortex stimulation in a conscious patient with bulbar pain.

机译:经颅和硬膜外运动皮层刺激诱发的意识下降伴延髓痛的降落凌空的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pattern of activation of motor cortex produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation and epidural electrical stimulation. METHODS: The spinal volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation and epidural electrical stimulation over the cerebral motor cortex were recorded from an electrode inserted into the cervical epidural space of one conscious subject who also had a cortical epidural electrode over the motor area. The volleys were termed D- and I-waves according to their latency. Magnetic stimulation was performed with a figure-of-eight coil and the induced current flowed either in a postero-anterior (PA) or in latero-medial (LM) direction. RESULTS: At active motor threshold intensity LM magnetic stimulation evoked a D wave whereas PA stimulation evoked an I(1) wave with later I waves being recruited at increasing stimulus intensities. Electrical epidural stimulation evoked both a D wave and I waves. However, the D wave evoked by electrical epidural stimulation had a longer latency than the LM D wave, suggesting either a more proximal site of activation of the pyramidal axon or activation of slightly faster conducting set of corticospinal fibres by LM stimulation. The I3 wave evoked by electrical epidural stimulation also had a longer latency than the PA I3-wave CONCLUSIONS: Epidural stimulation of the motor cortex can produce repetitive excitation of corticospinal neurones. The order of recruitment of the volleys, and the latency of the D and I3 waves may be slightly different to that seen after transcranial magnetic stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that there may be subtle differences in the populations of neurones activated by the two forms of stimulation.
机译:目的:比较经颅磁刺激和硬膜外电刺激产生的运动皮层激活模式。方法:通过插入一个知觉受试者的颈硬膜外腔中的电极记录经颅磁刺激和硬膜外电刺激在大脑运动皮质上引起的脊柱抽搐,该受试者在运动区域还具有皮质硬膜外电极。根据其潜伏期,将齐射称为D波和I波。用八字形线圈进行磁刺激,感应电流沿后前(PA)或沿后中(LM)方向流动。结果:在运动阈值强度下,LM磁刺激引起D波,而PA刺激引起I(1)波,后来的I波以增加的刺激强度被募集。硬膜外电刺激诱发D波和I波。然而,硬膜外电刺激诱发的D波的潜伏期比LM D波更长,这表明锥体轴突激活的更近端或LM刺激激活的皮质脊髓纤维的传导更快。电硬膜外刺激引起的I3波也比PA I3波具有更长的潜伏期。结论:运动皮质的硬膜外刺激可以产生皮质脊髓神经元的重复性刺激。凌空抽动的顺序以及D波和I3波的潜伏期可能与经颅磁刺激后所看到的略有不同。意义:我们的发现表明,两种形式的刺激激活的神经元群体可能存在细微差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号