...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior >CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT IN CHAIN SCHEDULES WHEN TIME TO REINFORCEMENT IS HELD CONSTANT?
【24h】

CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT IN CHAIN SCHEDULES WHEN TIME TO REINFORCEMENT IS HELD CONSTANT?

机译:时间表中的条件补强可以持续进行吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two alternative approaches describe determinants of responding to a stimulus temporally distant from primary reinforcement. One emphasizes the temporal relation of each stimulus to the primary reinforcer, with relative proximity of the stimulus determining response rate. A contrasting view emphasizes immediate consequences of responding to the stimulus, the key factor being the conditioned reinforcement value of those immediate consequences. To contrast these approaches, 4 pigeons were exposed to a two-component multiple schedule with three-link chain schedules in each component. Only middle-link stimuli differed between chains. Baseline reinforcement probabilities were 0.50 for both chains; during discrimination phases it was 1.0 for one chain and 0.0 for the other. During discrimination phases pigeons responded more to the reinforcement-correlated middle link than to the extinction-correlated middle link, demonstrating that responding was affected by the probability change. Terminal link responding was also higher in the reinforced chain, even though the terminal link stimulus was identical in both chains. Of greatest interest is initial link responding, which was temporally most distant from reinforcement. Initial link responding, necessarily equal in the two chains, was significantly higher during the 1.0/0.0 discrimination phases, even though overall reinforcement probability remained constant. For 3 of 4 birds, in fact, initial-link response rates were higher than terminal-link response rates, an outcome that can be ascribed only to the potent conditioned reinforcement properties of the middle-link stimulus during the discrimination phases. Results are incompatible with any account of chain behavior based solely on relative time to reinforcement.
机译:两种替代方法描述了对暂时远离主要强化的刺激做出反应的决定因素。人们强调了每种刺激与主要增强器的时间关系,刺激的相对接近程度决定了反应率。相反的观点则强调了对刺激的直接后果,关键因素是这些直接后果的条件强化价值。为了与这些方法进行对比,将4羽鸽子暴露于两成分的多重计划中,而每个成分中都有三环节链计划。链之间只有中间链接刺激不同。两条链的基线增强概率均为0.50;在辨别阶段,一个链为1.0,另一链为0.0。在辨别阶段,鸽子对与增强相关的中间环节的反应比对与消光相关的中间环节的反应要多,这表明响应受概率变化的影响。即使两个链中的末端链接刺激相同,末端链接的响应在增强链中也更高。最感兴趣的是初始链接响应,该响应在时间上与强化最远。即使在总体强化概率保持不变的情况下,在1.0 / 0.0辨别阶段,初始链接响应(在两个链中必须相等)明显更高。实际上,对于四只鸟中的三只,初始链接反应速率高于末端链接响应速率,这一结果只能归因于辨别阶段中中间链接刺激的有效条件增强特性。结果与仅基于加固的相对时间的链行为的任何说明都不相容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号