...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV >Comparative trial of moisturizer containing licochalcone A vs. hydrocortisone lotion in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis: a pilot study.
【24h】

Comparative trial of moisturizer containing licochalcone A vs. hydrocortisone lotion in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis: a pilot study.

机译:含有licochalcone A保湿剂与氢化可的松乳液的保湿剂在儿童特应性皮炎治疗中的比较试验:一项试验性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although moisturizer usage has been considered a mainstay of treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) patients, few clinical studies have been investigated. Recently, moisturizers containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, such as licochalcone A (LA) and vitamin B(12) are of emerging interest. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of moisturizer containing LA with hydrocortisone (HC) lotion in treatment of childhood AD. Methods The randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded 6-week study was conducted. Patients were administered with twice-daily application of LA lotion on one side of the body and HC lotion on the opposite side. The clinical outcome was assessed by the scoring of atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) index. The relapse rate was comparatively analysed by survival analysis. RESULTS: From 30 patients enrolled, 26 patients completed the protocol. The mean age of the children was 5.8 years. The average baseline SCORAD score is about 28 on both sides. The response rates of both agents were equal to 73.33%. There is no statistical significant group difference in reduction of SCORAD score. Although we observed more rapid resolution of oedema and erythema in areas treated with HC lotion, both agents exhibited no significant difference. The relapse rate of HC group was higher than in LA group; however, there was no significant difference. No side-effect was observed from both agents. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of LA lotion is equal to that of HC lotion. It was suggested that moisturizer containing LA could be used both for treatment of acute and maintenance phase in mild-to-moderate childhood AD.
机译:背景:尽管保湿剂的使用一直被认为是特应性皮炎(AD)患者治疗的主要手段,但很少进行临床研究。最近,含有非甾体类抗炎药的保湿剂,如licochalcone A(LA)和维生素B(12)引起了人们的兴趣。目的:比较含LA的保湿剂和氢化可的松(HC)乳液治疗儿童AD的有效性。方法进行了随机,对照,研究者盲目的6周研究。患者每天在身体的一侧使用LA乳液两次,在另一侧使用HC乳液。临床结果通过特应性皮炎(SCORAD)指数评分进行评估。通过生存分析比较复发率。结果:从30名患者中,有26名患者完成了方案。孩子的平均年龄是5.8岁。双方的平均基准SCORAD分数均为28。两种药物的反应率均等于73.33%。 SCORAD评分降低的组之间无统计学显着差异。尽管我们观察到用HC乳液处理过的区域水肿和红斑得到了更快的解决,但两种药物均无显着差异。 HC组的复发率高于LA组。但是,没有显着差异。两种药物均未观察到副作用。结论:LA乳液的功效与HC乳液相同。有人提出,含LA的保湿剂可用于轻度至中度儿童AD的急性期和维持期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号