首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences >A Tricky Object to Classify: Evidence, Postpartum Depression and the DSM-IV
【24h】

A Tricky Object to Classify: Evidence, Postpartum Depression and the DSM-IV

机译:分类的棘手对象:证据,产后抑郁和DSM-IV

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The concept of evidence has become central in Western healthcare systems; however, few investigations have studied how the shift toward specific definitions of evidence actually occurred in practice. This paper examines a historical case in psychiatry where the debate about how to define evidence was of central importance to nosological decision making. During the fourth revision of the Diagnostic andStatistical Manual of Mental Disorders a controversial decision was made to exclude postpartum depression (PPD) as a distinct disorder from the manual. On the basis of archival and interview data, I argue that the fundamental issues driving this decision were related to questions about what constituted suitable hierarchies of evidence and appropriate definitions of evidence. Further, although potentially buttressed by the evidence-based medicine movement, this shift toward a reliance on particular kinds of empirical evidence occurred when the dominant paradigm in American psychiatry changed from a psychodynamic approach to a research-based medical model.
机译:证据的概念已成为西方医疗体系的中心。但是,很少有研究研究在实践中实际上是如何朝着证据的特定定义转变的。本文研究了一个精神病学的历史案例,其中关于如何定义证据的辩论对于鼻病学决策至关重要。在《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》的第四版中,有争议的决定是将产后抑郁症(PPD)排除在手册之外。根据档案和访谈数据,我认为推动这一决定的根本问题与以下问题有关:什么构成适当的证据层次和适当的证据定义。此外,尽管可能会受到循证医学运动的支持,但当美国精神病学的主要范式从心理动力学方法转变为基于研究的医学模型时,这种依赖特定种类的经验证据的转变发生了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号