首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society >A Comparison of the ISO and AACC Methods for Determining the Activity of Trypsin Inhibitors in Soybean Meal
【24h】

A Comparison of the ISO and AACC Methods for Determining the Activity of Trypsin Inhibitors in Soybean Meal

机译:ISO和AACC方法测定豆粕中胰蛋白酶抑制剂活性的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The international standard method for the determination of trypsin inhibitor activity (TIA) in soya products, ISO 14902, was compared with the American Association of Cereal Chemists' standard AACC 22-40.01 as modified by Hamerstrand in 1981 (AACC-based method), using soybean meals as matrices. TIA, expressed as milligram of inhibited trypsin per gram of sample, was determined by both methods in each of 30 samples of soybean meal. TIA values according to ISO 14902 were significantly lower (P 0.001) than those afforded by the AACC-based method. This difference, which means that AACC-based method and ISO 14902 TIA values are not directly comparable, is attributable to between methods differences, in decreasing order of influence: particle size (P 0.01), trypsin inhibitor extraction method (P 0.05), and trypsin substrate (P 0.01). N-benzoyl-l-arginine-4-nitroanilide hydrochloride, the ISO 14902 trypsin substrate, affords TIA values 6.4 % higher than the racemic mixture used by the AACC method, but it seems unlikely that in most contexts this advantage would outweigh the disadvantage of its greater cost.
机译:确定大豆产品中胰蛋白酶抑制剂活性(TIA)的国际标准方法(ISO 14902)与美国谷物化学家协会(AACM 22-40.01)(由Hamerstrand于1981年修改)(基于AACC的方法)进行了比较豆粕作为基质。用两种方法分别在30个豆粕样品中测定TIA,以每克样品中受抑制的胰蛋白酶的毫克数表示。根据ISO 14902的TIA值比基于AACC的方法提供的TIA值显着更低(P <0.001)。这种差异意味着基于AACC的方法和ISO 14902 TIA值不能直接比较,这归因于方法之间的差异,并且影响程度递减:粒径(P <0.01),胰蛋白酶抑制剂提取方法(P <0.05)和胰蛋白酶底物(P <0.01)。 N-苯甲酰基-1-精氨酸-4-硝基苯胺盐酸盐(ISO 14902胰蛋白酶底物)的TIA值比AACC方法所用的外消旋混合物高6.4%,但是在大多数情况下,这种优势似乎不可能超过ACC的缺点。它的成本更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号