首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology >Layered closure versus buried sutures and adhesive strips for cheek defect repair after cutaneous malignancy excision.
【24h】

Layered closure versus buried sutures and adhesive strips for cheek defect repair after cutaneous malignancy excision.

机译:分层封闭与埋入式缝合线和粘合带的对比,用于皮肤恶性肿瘤切除后的面颊缺损修复。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Primary closure of surgical defects after excision of cutaneous malignancies has been traditionally accomplished with layered closure. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the cosmetic outcome of cheek defects repaired with layered closure versus buried sutures and adhesive strips. METHODS: In all, 38 patients underwent excision of a cutaneous malignancy on the cheek by primary excision or Mohs micrographic surgery. Patients were prospectively randomized to receive layered closure to one half of the repair and buried sutures with adhesive strip closure for the other half of the repair. Follow-up assessment was performed by a blinded evaluator using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: There were no differences in scar contour, erythema, or overall cosmesis between closure types. LIMITATIONS: All study participants were Caucasian, with a mean age of 68 years, limiting generalizability of results. CONCLUSION: Layered closure does not have a cosmetic advantage over buried sutures and adhesive strips for the primary repair of cheek defects.
机译:背景:切除皮肤恶性肿瘤后手术缺损的初步闭合传统上是采用分层闭合的方法完成的。目的:我们试图比较分层封闭修复的脸颊缺损与埋入式缝线和粘合带的美容效果。方法:总共有38例患者通过原发切除或Mohs显微外科手术切除了脸颊上的皮肤恶性肿瘤。前瞻性地将患者随机分为两组,分别接受修复的分层封闭和埋线缝合,另一半修复采用胶粘带封闭。盲人评估者使用视觉模拟量表进行随访评估。结果:闭合类型之间的疤痕轮廓,红斑或整体美容没有差异。局限性:所有研究参与者均为白种人,平均年龄为68岁,这限制了结果的普遍性。结论:层状闭合在面颊缺损的初步修复中没有比埋入式缝线和胶粘带美观的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号