首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association >Evaluation and comparison of the health status of Atlantic bottlenose dolphins from the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, and Charleston, South Carolina.
【24h】

Evaluation and comparison of the health status of Atlantic bottlenose dolphins from the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, and Charleston, South Carolina.

机译:评价和比较佛罗里达州印第安河泻湖和南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿的大西洋宽吻海豚的健康状况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To conduct health assessments and compare outcomes in 2 populations of Atlantic bottlenose dolphins. Design-Repeated cross-sectional study. ANIMALS: 171 Atlantic bottlenose dolphins. PROCEDURES: During June and August of 2003 through 2005, 89 dolphins from the Indian River Lagoon (IRL), Florida, and 82 dolphins from estuarine waters near Charleston, SC, were evaluated. A panel of 5 marine mammal veterinarians classified dolphins as clinically normal, possibly diseased, or definitely diseased on the basis of results of physical and ultrasonographic examinations, hematologic and serum biochemical analyses, and cytologic and microbiologic evaluations of gastric contents and swab specimens. RESULTS: Prevalence of dolphins classified as definitely diseased did not differ significantly between the IRL (32%) and Charleston (20%) sites. Proportions of dolphins classified as possibly diseased also did not differ. Lobomycosis was diagnosed in 9 dolphins from the IRL but in none of the dolphins from Charleston. Proportions of dolphins with orogenital papillomas did not differ significantly between the IRL (12%) and Charleston (7%) sites. From 2003 through 2005, the proportion classified as definitely diseased tripled among dolphins from the Charleston site but did not increase significantly among dolphins from the IRL. Dolphins from the Charleston site were more likely to have leukocytosis, lymphocytosis, and low serum concentrations of total protein and total J-globulins than were dolphins from the IRL. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: High prevalences of diseased dolphins were identified at both sites; however, the host or environmental factors that contributed to the various abnormalities detected are unknown.
机译:目的:对两个大西洋宽吻海豚进行健康评估并比较结果。设计重复截面研究。动物:171大西洋宽吻海豚。程序:在2003年6月和8月至2005年期间,对来自佛罗里达州印度河泻湖(IRL)的89只海豚和来自南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿附近河口水域的82只海豚进行了评估。根据物理和超声检查结果,血液学和血清生化分析结果以及胃内容物和拭子标本的细胞学和微生物学评估结果,由5名海洋哺乳动物兽医组成的小组将海豚归类为临床正常,可能患病或绝对患病的海豚。结果:被确定为患病的海豚的患病率在IRL(32%)和查尔斯顿(20%)位点之间没有显着差异。被分类为可能患病的海豚的比例也没有差异。在IRL的9只海豚中诊断出肺孢菌病,但在查尔斯顿的所有海豚中均未发现。在IRL(12%)和Charleston(7%)部位之间,具有生殖器乳头状瘤的海豚比例没有显着差异。从2003年到2005年,在查尔斯顿遗址的海豚中,被确定为患病的比例增加了三倍,但在IRL的海豚中却没有明显增加。与来自IRL的海豚相比,来自查尔斯顿(Charleston)地点的海豚更容易出现白细胞增多,淋巴细胞增多以及血清总蛋白和总J球蛋白含量低的现象。结论和临床意义:在两个地点都发现了患病海豚的高患病率。然而,导致各种异常的宿主或环境因素是未知的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号