...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography >Application of 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography appropriateness use criteria in hospitalized patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography in a community setting
【24h】

Application of 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography appropriateness use criteria in hospitalized patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography in a community setting

机译:2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国超声心动图学会适当性使用标准在社区环境中经胸腔超声心动图转诊的住院患者中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: A recent American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Society of Echocardiography document updated previous appropriate use criteria (AUC) for echocardiography. The aim of this study was to explore the application of the new AUC, and the resulting appropriateness rate, in hospitalized patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in a community setting. Methods: A total of 931 consecutive inpatients referred for TTE were prospectively recruited in five community hospitals. Patients were categorized as having appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate indications for TTE according to the AUC. An additional group of 259 inpatients, discharged without having been referred for TTE, was also considered. Results: In the group referred for TTE, the large majority of indications (98.8%) were classifiable according to the AUC with good interobserver reproducibility. Indications were appropriate in 739 patients (80.3%), of uncertain appropriateness in 46 (5.0%), and inappropriate in 135 (14.7%). Compared with patients with appropriate or uncertain indications, those with inappropriate indications were younger and more often referred by noncardiologists. Most common causes of inappropriate indications were related to the lack of changes in clinical status or to the absence of cardiovascular symptoms and signs. Examinations with appropriate or uncertain indications had an impact on clinical decision making more often than those with inappropriate indications (86.7% vs 14.1%, P <.0001). In the group discharged without having been referred for TTE, TTE might have been appropriate in 16.2% of cases. Conclusions: Clinical application of the new AUC was highly feasible in a community setting. Although inpatient referral for TTE was appropriate in most patients, strategies aimed at implementing these criteria in clinical practice are desirable.
机译:背景:最近的美国心脏病学会基金会和美国超声心动图学会文件更新了以前的超声心动图适当使用标准(AUC)。这项研究的目的是探讨在社区环境中经胸腔超声心动图(TTE)转诊的住院患者中新AUC的应用及其产生的适用率。方法:前瞻性招募了五家社区医院的931名连续住院的TTE患者。根据AUC,将患者分类为具有适当,不确定或不适当的TTE适应症。还考虑了另一组259名住院患者,他们出院时未转诊接受TTE。结果:在接受TTE治疗的组中,绝大多数适应症(98.8%)根据AUC可分类,观察者间可重复性良好。适应症适用于739例患者(80.3%),适用性不确定的患者46例(5.0%),不合适的患者135例(14.7%)。与适应症适当或不确定的患者相比,适应症不适当的患者较年轻,非心脏病医生更常转诊患者。不适当适应症的最常见原因与临床状况的变化或心血管症状和体征的缺乏有关。具有适当或不确定适应症的检查比具有不适当适应症的检查对临床决策的影响更大(86.7%vs 14.1%,P <.0001)。在未接受TTE转诊的出院人群中,TTE在16.2%的病例中可能是合适的。结论:新的AUC在社区中的临床应用是高度可行的。尽管在大多数患者中住院患者转诊TTE是适当的,但仍需要旨在在临床实践中实施这些标准的策略。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号