首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR >Impact of Electronic Resident Evaluation Systems on the Timeliness, Rate, and Quality of Responses Survey of Association of Program Directors in Radiology Members
【24h】

Impact of Electronic Resident Evaluation Systems on the Timeliness, Rate, and Quality of Responses Survey of Association of Program Directors in Radiology Members

机译:电子住院医师评估系统对放射科会员程序主任协会及时性,反应速度和反应质量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the impact of electronic resident evaluation systems on the timeliness, rate, and quality of responses.Methods: Surveys were mailed electronically to the membership of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology, which included the directors of 158 residency programs., Respondents were instructed to send 1 response from each program,, Information gathered included the use of electronic compared with paper-based evaluation systems and the overall level of satisfaction with such systems (rated on a 5-point scale with 1 =dissatisfied and 5 = satisfied), Questions were asked regarding the impact of electronic systems on the timeliness, rate, and quality of responses.Results: Seventy-seven responses were received, for an estimated response rate of 49% on a per-program basis. Of these 77 respondents, 45 (58%) used electronic systems and 32 (42%) used paper-based systems The median level of satisfaction was equivalent (4 = somewhat satisfied) for both groups, Of the 45 respondents using electronic systems, 26 (58%) reported increased response rates, 16 (36%) reported no change, and 3 (7%) reported decreased response rates compared with paper-based systems, Regarding the timeliness of responses, 31 (69%) reported faster response rates, 10 (22%) reported no change, and 4 (9%) reported slower rates compared with paper-based systems, Regarding the quality of responses, 25 (56%) reported no change, 12 (27%) reported improved quality, and 8 (18%) reported worse quality compared with paper-based systems.Conclusion: Electronic systems are generally associated with an improved response rate and enhanced timeliness of responses in comparison with paper-based systems, without adversely affecting the quality of responses.
机译:目的:确定居民电子评估系统对及时性,回复率和响应质量的影响。方法:将调查问卷以电子方式邮寄给放射学计划主任协会成员,其中包括158个住院医师项目的主任。指示受访者从每个程序中发送1个回复,所收集的信息包括与基于纸质的评估系统相比,使用电子方式以及对此类系统的总体满意度(以5分制评分,其中1 =不满意,5 =满意),询问有关电子系统对及时性,响应速度和响应质量的影响的问题。结果:收到了77个响应,每个程序的响应率为49%。在这77位受访者中,有45位(58%)使用电子系统,有32位(42%)使用纸质系统。两组的满意度中位数相等(4 =有点满意),在使用电子系统的45位受访者中,有26位(58%)报告的回应率增加,有16(36%)的报告没有变化,而3(7%)的报告的回应率与纸质系统相比有所下降,就响应的及时性而言,31(69%)的报告称回应速度更快,与纸质系统相比,有10(22%)表示没有变化,有4(9%)表示速度较慢,关于答复的质量,有25(56%)表示没有变化,有12(27%)表示质量有所提高,有8个(18%)报告的质量比纸质系统差。结论:与纸质系统相比,电子系统通常具有较高的响应率和增强的响应及时性,而对响应质量没有不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号