首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR >Comparison of European (ESR) and American (ACR) White Papers on Teleradiology: Patient Primacy Is Paramount
【24h】

Comparison of European (ESR) and American (ACR) White Papers on Teleradiology: Patient Primacy Is Paramount

机译:欧洲(ESR)和美国(ACR)远程放射医学白皮书比较:患者至上至关重要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ACR and European Society of Radiology white papers on teleradiology propose best practice guidelines for teleradiology, with each body focusing on its respective local situation, market, and legal regulations. The organizations have common viewpoints, the most important being patient primacy, maintenance of quality, and the "supplementary" position of teleradiology to local services. The major differences between the white papers are related mainly to the market situation, the use of teleradiology, teleradiologist credentialing and certification, the principles of "international" teleradiology, and the need to obtain "informed consent" from patients. The authors describe these similarities and differences by highlighting the background and context of teleradiology in Europe and the United States.
机译:ACR和欧洲放射学学会有关放射放射学的白皮书提出了放射放射学的最佳实践指南,每个机构都专注于其各自的当地情况,市场和法律法规。这些组织有共同的观点,最重要的是患者至上,质量保持以及远程放射学对本地服务的“辅助”地位。白皮书之间的主要差异主要与市场情况,远程放射学的使用,远程放射科医生的资格证书和认证,“国际”远程放射学的原理以及获得患者“知情同意”的需求有关。作者通过强调欧洲和美国的远程放射学的背景和背景来描述这些异同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号