【24h】

When Expert Coding Advice Isn't

机译:如果没有专家编码建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

With ongoing attention to correct coding by payers in both the public and private sectors, many radiology practices have appropriately sought expert advice to ensure the integrity of their billing operations. That advice, usually obtained from consultants and subscription newsletters, is not without cost, but the price pales in comparison with recent 7-figure settlements for radiology billing irregularities [ 1 ]. As one might predict, the quality of so-called authoritative coding advice is heterogeneous. Practices seeking guidance should carefully assess the reputation of their experts before they buy.
机译:随着公共和私营部门付款人对正确编码的持续关注,许多放射学实践已经适当地寻求专家建议,以确保其计费操作的完整性。通常从顾问和订阅新闻通讯中获得的建议并非没有成本,但与最近针对放射计费违规行为的7位数和解相比,价格显得苍白[1]。可以预见,所谓的权威编码建议的质量是不同的。寻求指导的实践应在购买专家之前仔细评估其声誉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号