首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of
【24h】

ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of

机译:ACCF / ASE / ACEP / AHA / ASNC / SCAI / SCCT / SCMR 2008年应力超声心动图的适用性标准:美国心脏学会心动图学会美国心脏病学会基金会适当性标准特别工作组的报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) together with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriateness review for stress echocardiography. The review assessed the risks and benefits of stress echocardiography for several indications or clinical scenarios and scored them on a scale of 1 to 9 (based upon methodology developed by the ACCF to assess imaging appropriateness). The upper range (7 to 9) implies that the test is generally acceptable and is a reasonable approach, and the lower range (1 to 3) implies that the test is generally not acceptable and is not a reasonable approach. The midrange (4 to 6) indicates a clinical scenario for which the indication for a stress echocardiogram is uncertain. The indications for this review were drawn from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines. Use of stress echocardiography for risk assessment in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) was viewed favorably, while routine repeat testing and general screening in certain clinical scenarios were viewed less favorably. It is anticipated that these results will have a significant impact on physician decision making and performance, reimbursement policy, and will help guide future research.
机译:美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF)和美国超声心动图学会(ASE)以及主要的专业和亚专业学会一起对压力超声心动图进行了适当性审查。该评价评估了几种指征或临床情况的应力超声心动图的风险和益处,并以1到9的等级对它们进行了评分(基于ACCF开发的评估影像学适用性的方法)。较高的范围(7到9)表示该测试通常是可接受的并且是合理的方法,较低的范围(1到3)意味着该测试通常是不可接受的并且不是合理的方法。中档(4到6)表示临床情景,对于该情景,压力超声心动图的指征不确定。这篇综述的适应症是根据常见的应用或预期的用途以及当前的临床实践指南得出的。在冠心病(CAD)患者中使用压力超声心动图进行风险评估被认为是有利的,而在某些临床情况下进行常规重复测试和常规筛查则被认为是不利的。预计这些结果将对医师的决策和绩效,报销政策产生重大影响,并有助于指导未来的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号