...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association >A Review of studies comparing methods for determining transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold: Observation of movement or electromyography assisted
【24h】

A Review of studies comparing methods for determining transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold: Observation of movement or electromyography assisted

机译:比较研究确定经颅磁刺激运动阈的方法的研究综述:运动或肌电图辅助观察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Early in the development of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a research tool, scientists developed the concept of motor threshold (MT) as a method of quantifying dose and establishing safety. Neurophysiologists determined the MT with the aid of peripheral electromyography (EMG). More recently, clinicians started substituting the EMG with observed movements (OM) of the hand or digits. It is unclear whether the two approaches (EMG and OM) reach similar conclusions about an individual's cortical excitability and when best to use each approach. OBJECTIVE: To review TMS studies directly comparing the EMG and OM MT methods. DESIGN: A systematic search of the literature on Medline from January 1995 through April 2008. RESULTS: Four articles directly compared the two approaches, reaching different and opposing findings. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supporting the substitution of EMG with OM is sparse and conflicting. Clinicians stimulating at or near safety guidelines should use the EMG method.
机译:背景:在经颅磁刺激(TMS)作为研究工具的早期,科学家开发了运动阈值(MT)的概念,作为量化剂量和建立安全性的一种方法。神经生理学家借助周围肌电图(EMG)确定了MT。最近,临床医生开始用观察到的手或手指运动(OM)代替EMG。目前尚不清楚这两种方法(EMG和OM)是否就个人的皮层兴奋性以及何时最佳使用每种方法得出相似的结论。目的:直接回顾TMS研究,比较EMG和OM MT方法。设计:系统检索1995年1月至2008年4月在Medline上的文献。结果:四篇文章直接比较了两种方法,得出了截然相反的发现。结论:支持OM替代EMG的证据稀少且相互矛盾。刺激达到或接近安全准则的临床医生应使用EMG方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号