...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sensory studies >Comparison of discrimination ability between a panel of blind assessors and a panel of sighted assessors
【24h】

Comparison of discrimination ability between a panel of blind assessors and a panel of sighted assessors

机译:盲目评估者小组和有视力的评估者小组之间的歧视能力比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this work was to compare a panel of blind assessors with one of sighted assessors in the discrimination of food products. Each panel had 20 screened and trained assessors. Five commercial food products were used: crackers, liver paste, powdered orange juice mix, Reggiano cheese and yogurt. Slight flavor and/or texture modifications were introduced for adequate discrimination difficulty. Each pair of products was tested by both panels using the triangle test and a scaled difference from control test. Numbers of correct answers for the triangle test were similar for both panels. There were minor differences between the panels in the difference from control test, due to the sighted panel having more training in the use of the scale. Overall the panels of trained blind and sighted assessors were equivalent in their performance.
机译:这项工作的目的是比较盲目评估者小组和有视力评估者小组对食品的歧视。每个小组有20名经过筛选和训练有素的评估员。使用了五种商业食品:饼干,肝糊,橙汁粉,雷吉亚诺奶酪和酸奶。引入了轻微的风味和/或质地修饰,以提供足够的辨别难度。每对产品均由两个面板使用三角测试和与对照测试的比例差异进行测试。两个面板的三角形测试的正确答案数量相似。面板之间的差异与对照测试的差异很小,这是因为有眼力的面板接受了更多有关秤的培训。总体而言,训练有素的盲人和视力鉴定师的小组表现相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号