...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Shellfish Research >BENTHIC SPAT COLLECTION OF SOFTSHELL CLAMS (MYA ARENARIA LINNAEUS, 1758) USING MATS
【24h】

BENTHIC SPAT COLLECTION OF SOFTSHELL CLAMS (MYA ARENARIA LINNAEUS, 1758) USING MATS

机译:使用垫子在软体外壳底栖动物身上收集斑马鱼(MYA ARENARIA LINNAEUS,1758)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Supply of softshell clam (Mya arenaria) seed for culture and restoration usually comes from hatcheries or through transfers from one site to another. Natural spat collection using Astro-Turf mats installed directly onto the sediments could be a viable alternative. Here, we describe a series of experiments to examine the performance of mats for benthic collection, and how to use them efficiently. Interannual variability was studied for an 8-y period (2002 to 2009) at a commercial clam culture site located in the Havre-aux-Maisons lagoon (Iles-de-la-Madeleine, southern Gulf of St. Lawrence). Spat collection (clams, 2.5-15 mm) ranged from 883-2,422 clams/m(2) (overall mean, 1,599 clams/m(2)). Throughout the years, clams on the mats were 7 times more abundant than in the nearby sediments. Their mean shell length varied from 7.3-9.9 mm relative to the year. Mats were deployed during an extended 5-wk period (early June to early July), and also retrieved during an extended 5-wk period (early September to early October) with no negative effect on collection success. Indeed, spat abundance was higher when mats were retrieved later in the season (late September to early October). Spat collection was et-eater at the mid to upper intertidal level (1,551-2,622 clams > 2.5 mm/m(2)) compared with the lower intertidal (near-subtidal) level (586 clams > 2.5 mm/m2). Indeed, the lowest abundances and the smallest sizes were observed on mats deployed at the lower intertidal level. Mats were installed side-by-side in groups of 35 (7 X 5), with no negative impact on collection success compared with individual mats. Last, spat collection was examined at two different sites within the lagoon for 4 y. Although the overall mean number of clams was similar at both sites (1,538 clams > 2.5 mm/m2 vs. 1,503 clams > 2.5 mm/m(2)), collection success varied among sites (951-1,916 clams > 2.5 mm/m(2) vs. 552-2,938 clams > 2.5 mm/m(2)) from year to year. Therefore, collection success with mats should be investigated for any new site and for several years.
机译:用于养殖和恢复的soft蛤(Mya arenaria)种子的供应通常来自孵化场或从一个地点转移到另一个地点。使用直接安装在沉积物上的Astro-Turf垫子进行自然spa收集可能是一种可行的选择。在这里,我们描述了一系列实验,以检查用于底栖收集的垫子的性能以及如何有效地使用它们。在位于Havre-aux-Maisons泻湖(圣劳伦斯湾南部的Iles-de-la-Madeleine)的商业蛤养殖场,研究了8年期间(​​2002年至2009年)的年际变化。吐口收集物(2.5-15 mm的蛤ms)范围为883-2,422蛤/米(2)(总体平均值为1,599蛤/米(2))。多年来,垫子上的蛤abundant比附近沉积物中的蛤abundant多7倍。它们的平均壳长相对于一年从7.3-9.9毫米不等。在延长的5周期间(6月初至7月初)部署了垫子,并且在延长的5周期间(9月初至10月初)也回收了垫子,对收集成功没有负面影响。的确,当季后期(9月下旬至10月初)取回垫子时,吐司的丰度更高。与潮间带下层(近潮下)水平(586蛤类> 2.5 mm / m2)相比,潮间带中上层(上至下潮间)(1,551-2,622蛤> 2.5毫米/米2)的食量更高。实际上,在潮间水平较低的地方部署的垫子上观测到最低的丰度和最小的尺寸。垫子以35个(7 X 5)的形式并排安装,与单个垫子相比,对采集成功没有负面影响。最后,在泻湖内的两个不同地点检查了吐痰4年。尽管两个地点的蛤mean平均总数相似(1,538蛤 2.5 mm / m2与1,503蛤 2.5 mm / m(2)),但采集成功率因地点而异(951-1,916蛤 2.5 mm / m( 2)与每年2.5毫米/平方米(2)的552-2,938蛤。因此,应该在任何新地点和几年内调查垫子的收集成功与否。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号