【24h】

Editorial March 2015

机译:社论2015年3月

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This issue of Journal of Radiology Nursing (JRN) is only the second time the articles in the journal have been focused on a denned topic, in this instance, legal topics of interest to the radiology nurse. I hope the audience of the journal finds this information useful for everyday practice. As I was putting together the March issue table of contents in early November, I saw a program note from the Radiological Society of North America November meeting. Included in the program was a session entitled "Mock Jury Trial." In September, I had read an article entitled "Too many abandon the 'second victims' of medical errors (Grissinger, 2014); this article discusses the same topic as the article in this issue entitled "Living through litigation: Malpractice stress syndrome." The article in this issue entitled "The most frequent and costly triggers of litigation for nurses in radiology settings" reminds me of "The chest radiograph: low reward, high risk, extreme uncertainty" (or "A radiologist considers the disconnect between evidence-based medicine and the courtroom") (Jha, 2014, p. 10), which speaks to a missed chest x-ray diagnosis and discusses the concept of lead-time bias, missing a finding versus calling out false alarms.
机译:本期《放射护理学期刊》(JRN)只是该期刊上的文章第二次侧重于一个既定主题,在本例中是放射线护士感兴趣的法律主题。我希望期刊的读者发现这些信息对日常实践有用。当我在11月初整理3月发行的目录时,我看到了北美放射学会11月会议的节目单。该计划包括一个名为“模拟陪审团审判”的会议。 9月,我读了一篇题为“太多人放弃医疗错误的第二受害者”的文章(Grissinger,2014年);该文章讨论了与本期文章“生活在诉讼中:医疗事故压力综合症”相同的主题。本期文章的标题为“放射学环境中护士诉讼的最频繁,最昂贵的触发因素”使我想起“胸部X光片:低报酬,高风险,极端不确定性”(或“放射线医师认为循证医学之间存在脱节。医学和法庭”)(Jha,2014年,第10页),讲述了X光胸片漏诊诊断的问题,并讨论了前置时间偏向的概念,错失了发现和发出了虚假警报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号