首页> 外文期刊>Clinical immunology: The official journal of the Clinical Immunology Society >Monitoring of basophil activation using CD63 and CCR3 in allergy to muscle relaxant drugs.
【24h】

Monitoring of basophil activation using CD63 and CCR3 in allergy to muscle relaxant drugs.

机译:使用CD63和CCR3监测对肌肉松弛药过敏的嗜碱性粒细胞活化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Allergic or pseudoallergic reactions that occur during anesthesia have been increasing for the last few years. To date, the diagnosis of allergy to muscle relaxants remains difficult. In this respect, we developed a flow cytometric method for the study of drug-induced basophil degranulation using CD63 and CCR3. Fifty patients who developed clinical features evocative of allergic reactions immediately after induction of anesthesia were included and classified into two groups. Group 1 (n = 39) comprised true allergic patients, who developed typical signs of shock associated to positive skin testing. Group 2 (n = 11) consisted of patients whose clinical history was not typical and skin testing was negative or nonconclusive. Seventeen control subjects were also studied in this report. We compared data from flow cytometry to skin tests, specific IgE, and histamine release results. Flow cytometry showed a sensitivity of 54%, while that of specific IgE was similar, at 62%. Interestingly, when considering the sensitivity of IgE + CD63 for diagnosis, we reached a sensitivity value of 80%. Of 15 negative results for specific IgE, we found 7 positive CD63 tests, while histamine release gave positive results in only 2 cases. Furthermore, the CD63 protocol showed good specificity (100%). We conclude that our flow cytometry protocol is a promising tool in allergy diagnosis since it is specific and complementary to specific IgE detection. Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).
机译:在过去的几年中,麻醉期间发生的变态反应或拟变态反应一直在增加。迄今为止,对肌肉松弛剂过敏的诊断仍然很困难。在这方面,我们开发了一种流式细胞术方法,用于研究使用CD63和CCR3的药物诱导的嗜碱性粒细胞脱粒。包括五十名在麻醉诱导后立即表现出可引起过敏反应的临床特征的患者,并将其分为两组。第一组(n = 39)包括真正的过敏患者,他们出现与皮肤测试阳性相关的典型休克体征。第2组(n = 11)由临床病史不典型且皮肤检查阴性或不确定的患者组成。本报告还研究了十七名对照对象。我们比较了从流式细胞仪到皮肤测试,特定IgE和组胺释放结果的数据。流式细胞仪显示的敏感性为54%,而特异性IgE的敏感性为62%。有趣的是,考虑IgE + CD63诊断的敏感性时,我们达到了80%的敏感性值。在特异性IgE的15例阴性结果中,我们发现7例CD63阳性,而组胺释放仅2例阳性。此外,CD63协议显示出良好的特异性(100%)。我们得出的结论是,我们的流式细胞仪协议是过敏诊断中的一种有前途的工具,因为它是特异性IgE检测的补充。版权所有2001 Elsevier Science(美国)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号