首页> 外文期刊>Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. >Comparison of hemihypoglossal-facial nerve transposition with a cross-facial nerve graft and muscle transplant for the rehabilitation of facial paralysis using the Facial clima method
【24h】

Comparison of hemihypoglossal-facial nerve transposition with a cross-facial nerve graft and muscle transplant for the rehabilitation of facial paralysis using the Facial clima method

机译:面面部神经置换与面神经移植和肌肉移植修复面部麻痹法修复面瘫的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To compare quantitatively the results obtained after hemihypoglossal nerve transposition and microvascular gracilis transfer associated with a cross facial nerve graft (CFNG) for reanimation of a paralysed face, 66 patients underwent hemihypoglossal transposition (n = 25) or microvascular gracilis transfer and CFNG (n = 41). The commissural displacement (CD) and commissural contraction velocity (CCV) in the two groups were compared using the system known as Facial clima. There was no inter-group variability between the groups (p > 0.10) in either variable. However, intra-group variability was detected between the affected and healthy side in the transposition group (p = 0.036 and p = 0.017, respectively). The transfer group had greater symmetry in displacement of the commissure (CD) and commissural contraction velocity (CCV) than the transposition group and patients were more satisfied. However, the transposition group had correct symmetry at rest but more asymmetry of CCV and CD when smiling.
机译:为了定量比较半舌舌神经移位和与交叉面神经移植物(CFNG)相关联的微血管睫状体转移使瘫痪的脸复活后获得的结果,对66例患者进行了半舌舌移位(n = 25)或微血管睫状体转移和CFNG(n = 41)。使用面部面部矫正系统比较两组的合缝位移(CD)和合缝收缩速度(CCV)。在两个变量中,组之间均无组间差异(p> 0.10)。但是,在换位组的患侧和健康侧之间检测到组内差异(分别为p = 0.036和p = 0.017)。与换位组相比,换位组的连合移位(CD)和合缝收缩速度(CCV)对称性更大,患者更满意。然而,转座组在休息时具有正确的对称性,但在微笑时CCV和CD的对称性更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号